How to disprove $8q^2+15=7m^2$ for any integral value of $q$ and $m$ 
Question Statement:-
Show that the quadratic equation $x^2+7x-14(q^2+1)=0$, where $q$ is an integer, has no integral roots.


My attempt at a solution:-
For the given quadratic equation having rational coefficients  to have integral roots the discriminant $D$ of the equation needs to be a perfect square.
$$\therefore D=(7)^2+56(q^2+1)=56q^2+105=7(8q^2+15)$$
Now, from the expression for the discriminant we see that $(8q^2+15)$ is always odd so for the discriminant to be a perfect square, the following condition needs to be satisfied
$$8q^2+15=7(2n+1)^2,\qquad\qquad\text{where n $\in Z$}$$
So $$2(q^2+1)=7(n^2+n)$$
After this I was having trouble coming up with a way to disprove the above equality that I came up with, if you could help me out as to how to proceed from here on or maybe suggest a way that makes it easier for me to prove what the question asks.
 A: If $7(8q^2+15)$ is a perfect square, $8q^2+15$ is divisible by $7$, which is equivalent to $q^2 \equiv -1 \pmod 7$. This is well known to be impossible.
A: If $x$ is a root of $x^2+7x-14(q^2+1)=0$, then $x$ is a multiple of $7$ because $x^2=7(-x+2(q^2+1))$.
Write $x=7y$. Then $7(y^2+y)=2(q^2+1)$ and so $7$ divides $q^2+1$. But this cannot happen because $7 \equiv 3 \bmod 4$. Or you can just check all possible residues of $q \bmod 7$ and see that $q^2+1$ is never $0$.
A: $$8q^2+15=7m^2\Rightarrow q^2+1\equiv 0\pmod 7$$ but $q^2=-1$ has no solution in $\Bbb F_7$ because $(\Bbb F_7)^2=\{1,2,4,0\}$.
Actually $8q^2+15$ never is a multiple of $7$.
A: If $x^2+7x-14(q^2+1)=0$, where $x,q\in\mathbb Z$, then $$7\mid 7\left(2\left(q^2+1\right)-x\right)=x^2$$ so by Euclid's Lemma $7\mid x$, so $7^2\mid x^2$ and $7^2\mid 7x$, so $$7^2\mid x^2+7x=7\left(2\left(q^2+1\right)\right),$$
so $7\mid 2\left(q^2+1\right)$. Since $\gcd(7,2)=1$, by Euclid's Lemma $7\mid q^2+1$, i.e. $q^2\equiv -1\pmod{7}$, which is impossible, because $0^2\equiv 0$, $(\pm 1)^2\equiv 1$, $(\pm 2)^2\equiv 4$, $(\pm 3)\equiv 2$ mod $7$, so $-1$ isn't a quadratic residue mod $7$.
Another way here is noticing that $7$ is a prime of the form $4k+3$, $k\in\mathbb Z$, so by Quadratic Reciprocity (or a separate lemma, which is a lot easier to prove than quadratic reciprocity) $-1$ isn't a quadratic residue mod $7$.
A: Since congruence arithmetic is unfamiliar we give a solution avoiding them.
Note $\ 7\mid 2m\,\Rightarrow\, 7\mid 7m-3(2m) = m.\,$ So $\,\  7\mid 2(1+q^2)\,\Rightarrow\, 7\mid 1+q^2$
Dividing $\,q\,$ by $\,7\,$ we have $\, q = a + 7b\,$ with remainder $\,a\,$ satisfying $\,0\le a \le 6$
Thus $\ 1+q^2 = 1+a^2+14ab+49b^2 = 1+a^2 + 7(2ab+7b^2)$
so $\ 7\mid 1+q^2\,\Rightarrow\, 7\mid 1+a^2\,$ for some $a$ with $\,0\le a\le 6,\,$ a contradiction (check all $7$ cases).
