2
$\begingroup$

Let $$S_g = \langle a_1,b_1,...,a_g,b_g \mid \prod_{i=1}^g[a_i,b_i] = 1 \rangle$$ be the fundamental group of a genus $g$ orientable surface. Why is $S_g \ast S_h \cong S_{g+h}$, and is there a nice canonical isomorphism?

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

Those groups are not isomorphic, for example the free product has infinitely many ends and the surface group has one end since it is quasi-isometric to the hyperbolic plane (surface groups act geometrically on the hyperbolic plane you can apply Svarc-Milnor) which is one ended. You might be interested in Stallings theorem on ends.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks - sorry I miss understood something - thanks for the help! $\endgroup$ – user101010 Nov 3 '16 at 1:03
  • $\begingroup$ @user101010 Not a problem, it is a somewhat cute problem to prove false, and to see some applications of basic geometric group theory. $\endgroup$ – Paul Plummer Nov 3 '16 at 1:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Nice answer! Here's a perhaps more topological way to do it, however: surfaces are $K(G, 1)$-spaces, so an isomorphism $S_g * S_h \cong S_{g+h}$ gives a homotopy equivalence $\Sigma_g \vee \Sigma_h \cong \Sigma_{g+h}$, where $\Sigma_\bullet$ denotes a surface of appropriate genus. But the 2nd homology groups don't agree. In short, the 2nd group (co)homology of the two groups don't agree. $\endgroup$ – Balarka Sen Nov 29 '16 at 10:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.