0
$\begingroup$

Let $G$ be a simple group and there exists a subgroup $H$ of index $n \in \mathbb{N}_{\ge 3}$. Show that: $|G|$ divides $n!/2.$ I saw a similar question here.

There was written: "The proof is really simple. Let $X$ be the set of left cosets of $H$. Consider $\phi: G \to \text{Sym}(X)$ given by $\phi(x)(aH)=(xa)H$. Then $\phi$ is a homomorphism. Consider now $K=\ker \phi$. Then $K$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ contained in $H$. Finally, $G/K$ is isomorphic to a subgroup of $\text{Sym}(X)$, which has order $n!$, where $n=[G:H]$. Thus, $[G:K]$ is finite and divides $n!$."

In fact, I don't understand the last sentence. "Thus, $[G:K]$ is finite and divides $n!$." Also did I understand it right that $ker(\phi)=H$? Can you also give me an advice how to proof it for $n \ge 3$. (maybe induction)

Thank you for taking your time.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Sym(X), is the group of permutations of the collections of cosets, $G/H$. As $H$ has index $n$, this group Sym($X$) is of order $n!$. As $K$ is the kernal of $\phi$ we see$\phi$ leads to an injective homomorphism $G/K\to Sym(X)$ and by Lagrange's theorem its order should divide $n!$. As there is anormal subgroup of index 2 (consisting of even permutations) in Sym($X$), the image of the simple group $G$ should be contained in that normal subgroup otherwise its intersection will lead to a proper normal subgroup in $G$, contradicting its simplicity. So $|G|$ divides $n!/2$

EDIT: I should explore if it is possible for image of $\phi$ to have trivial intersection with Alt(X). In that case the sign homomorphism $S_n\to\{\pm1\}$ restricts to a non-trivial homomorphism on Image of $G$, whose kernel gives a proper nontrivial normal subgroup in image of $G$ and hence on $G$ contradicting the simplicity of $G$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Why there is a subgroup of index 2? $\endgroup$ – milui Nov 1 '16 at 9:11
  • $\begingroup$ Alt(X) is a subgroup of index 2 in Sym(X), that is of order $n!/2$. $\endgroup$ – P Vanchinathan Nov 1 '16 at 9:14
  • $\begingroup$ But $S_X$ isn't the image of $G$. $\endgroup$ – Stefan4024 Nov 1 '16 at 9:15
  • $\begingroup$ Doesn't have to be. The image is a subgroup of Alt(X). $\endgroup$ – P Vanchinathan Nov 1 '16 at 9:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'll edit the answer now to rule out this possibility. $\endgroup$ – P Vanchinathan Nov 1 '16 at 9:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.