20
$\begingroup$

I've just stumbled upon Gorodentsev's upcoming textbook 'Algebra I'. The description of it claims that it's very 'Russian-style'.

This book is the first volume of an intensive “Russian-style” two-year graduate course in abstract algebra, and introduces readers to the basic algebraic structures – fields, rings, modules, algebras, groups, and categories – and explains the main principles of and methods for working with them.

What does this mean? What differs 'Russian-style' from 'American-style' mathematics?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is a guess, but it sounds like something akin to a style of rigor perhaps employed at Russian universities. You could perhaps read up on math and science education in the time of the Soviet Union. $\endgroup$ – Sean Roberson Oct 31 '16 at 17:31
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ One might view "Russian style" as "math that skips steps." It can be intimidating since the steps that are skipped are implicitly viewed as being "obvious." $\endgroup$ – Michael Oct 31 '16 at 17:32
  • 8
    $\begingroup$ I would understand it as elitist and intellectually demanding, the kind of course that aims at pushing the smartest 10% of the class as far as they can be pushed, even at the cost of failing 80% -- whereas a stereotypically "American-style" course would aim at making as many students as possible pass, even at the cost of the 10% brightest only learning a tenth of what they could have achieved in a course tailored for them. $\endgroup$ – Henning Makholm Oct 31 '16 at 17:39
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Kolmogorov, Chebyshev, Markov, Lusin, Suslin, Egorov, Khinchin, Vinogradov, Pontryagin, ... are all great Russian mathematicians; perhaps their works would speak for Russian style. :) $\endgroup$ – Megadeth Oct 31 '16 at 17:41
  • $\begingroup$ The springer page also states "Challenging amount of material thoughtfully organized for deep and fast learning" maybe this is what is meant. $\endgroup$ – PhoemueX Oct 31 '16 at 19:06
14
$\begingroup$

Russian-style should be understood not in opposition to American-style (that's cold war stuff) but rather in opposition to French-style or more precisely Bourbaki-style. The latter emphasizes formalism even sometimes at the expense of readability. The Russian style tends to focus on the essence rather than the formalism, and emphasize what is novel. A good example of accessible, popular, and rigorous writing in the Russian-style is a typical book by Vladimir Arnold; for example, his Mathematical methods of classical mechanics, an all-time favorite.

The flip side of excessive formalism is often committing errors; this was richly illustrated in the case of Bourbaki by Adrian Mathias; see e.g., his http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF03025863 .

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "To the question "what is 2 + 3" a French primary school pupil replied: "3 + 2, since addition is commutative". He did not know what the sum was equal to and could not even understand what he was asked about!" — V. I. Arnold (in On teaching mathematics) $\endgroup$ – Rodrigo de Azevedo Nov 1 '16 at 12:40
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Well this particular story doesn't go very far because a certain French mathematician stepped forward at MathOverflow and claimed that he was that child, and he meant it as a joke, so Arnold may have overused that example. At any rate the calamities of Bourbaki style are well-known and have recently been critiqued by Mathias; see e.g. link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF03025863 @RodrigodeAzevedo $\endgroup$ – Mikhail Katz Nov 1 '16 at 12:43
  • 3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ How can a textbook claim to be for aspiring mathematicians and not be written in Bourbaki-Style? I thought formalism was the whole point of mathematics. $\endgroup$ – ClassicEndingMusic Nov 1 '16 at 13:51
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ @ClassicEndingMusic, as a professional mathematician I hurry to disabuse you of the notion that Bourbaki-style is obligatory or for that matter desirable; but perhaps this is a subject for a separate question. $\endgroup$ – Mikhail Katz Nov 1 '16 at 13:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.