Question: Suppose $(A,<)$ and $(B,<)$ are two dense linear orders without end points, of size $2^{\aleph_0}$, and both $\aleph_1$-saturated (every type over a countable subset has a realization). Are they isomorphic?

I know that under the continuum hypothesis, one can use a back & forth argument because it is true that any two $\kappa$-saturated models of size $\kappa$ have to be isomorphic. However, I don't know what happen in the general case.

Are there examples assuming $\neg CH$?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I have heard that the negation of the CH proves there are two non-isomorphic ultrapower of $\mathbb{R}$. $\endgroup$
    – Hanul Jeon
    Oct 26, 2016 at 19:20
  • $\begingroup$ @HanulJeon Well, there are always if we consider the ultrafilter to be either principal or non-principal, but of course you mean (I guess) two ultrapowers of $\mathbb{R}$ with respect to non-principal ultrafilters. Do you have a reference for that? $\endgroup$
    – Darío G
    Oct 26, 2016 at 19:46
  • $\begingroup$ I don't have a reference for that, but the question in that site seems to be relevant. $\endgroup$
    – Hanul Jeon
    Oct 26, 2016 at 19:50
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Although, probably even the existence of two non-isomorphic ultrapowers of the field $\mathbb{R}$ does not answer the question: It is still possible that the linear orderings induced by them are isomorphic, isn't it? $\endgroup$
    – Darío G
    Oct 26, 2016 at 19:53
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Sorry, I was checking the paper in your link and it seems to answer the problem: Theorem 1 in the link below is that if $CH$ fails and $A$ is unstable with $|A|\leq 2^{\aleph_0}$ then there are $2^{\aleph_0}$ non-isomorphic ultraprowers of $A$. So, we can simply use $A=(\mathbb{Q},<)$ and apply the theorem. Interesting! math.yorku.ca/~ifarah/Ftp/2009i19-ultrapowers.pdf $\endgroup$
    – Darío G
    Oct 26, 2016 at 20:00

1 Answer 1


Suppose we have $2^{\aleph_0}>\aleph_1$.

Hausdorff showed that there is an $\eta_1$-order without end points of size $2^{\aleph_0}$, that is, a totally ordered set $\Bbb A=(A,<)$ having the following properties:

  • $\Bbb A$ has neither a coinitial nor a cofinal subset of size $<\aleph_1;$
  • For any $B,C$ subsets of $A$ both of size less than $\aleph_1$ with $B<C$, there is some $a\in A$ with $B<a<C$.

$\eta_1$-orders without end points are $\aleph_1$-saturated models; see section $5.4$ of Chang & Keisler's Model Theory, third edition.

Let $<_1$ be the lexicographical order on $\omega_1\times A$, and set $\Bbb A_1=(\omega_1\times A,<_1)$.

Build another total order $\Bbb A_2$ just like $\Bbb A_1$, but instead of using $\omega_1$, use $\omega_2$.

As $A$ has no end points, it is easy to see both $\Bbb A_1$ and $\Bbb A_2$ are $\eta_1$-orders. These orders have no end points, thus they are $\aleph_1$-saturated, and have size $2^{\aleph_0}$. However, they cannot be isomorphic as $\Bbb A_1$ has a cofinal subset of size $\aleph_1$, while $\Bbb A_2$ does not.

  • $\begingroup$ By the first property, do you mean "Every countable set is bounded from above and below", right? $\endgroup$
    – Asaf Karagila
    Nov 23, 2016 at 19:09
  • $\begingroup$ Hi @AsafKaragila, yes, that's indeed what I mean. $\endgroup$ Nov 23, 2016 at 19:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.