2
$\begingroup$

In his book Measure Theory, Halmos defines a Baire subset of a locally compact Hausdorff space $ X $ as an element of the smallest $ \sigma $-ring (not $ \sigma $-algebra) on $ X $ containing the $ G_{\delta} $ compact subsets of $ X $, i.e., compact subsets that are the intersection of countably many open subsets.

My question is as follows:

Question. If $ G $ is a locally compact Hausdorff topological group, and $ \mu $ is a Haar measure on $ G $ (defined on the Borel $ \sigma $-ring on $ G $, i.e., the smallest $ \sigma $-ring on $ G $ containing the compact subsets of $ G $), then is every Baire subset of $ G $ (which is a Borel subset of $ G $ also) $ \sigma $-finite w.r.t. $ \mu $?

Halmos’s discussion of measurable groups in his book seems to take this as fact, but I was unable to find a proof anywhere.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

This is basically immediate from the fact that $\mu$ is finite on compact sets. The collection of sets $A$ such that $\mu$ is $\sigma$-finite on $A$ is a $\sigma$-ring (since it is closed under taking countable unions and subsets), and thus contains all Baire sets (indeed, it contains all Borel sets if you define those as the $\sigma$-ring generated by compact sets).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! Did you mean the following? The collection $ \mathscr{R} $ of all $ \sigma $-finite elements of the Borel $ \sigma $-ring $ \mathscr{B} $ is a sub-$ \sigma $-ring of $ \mathscr{B} $, but as $ \mathscr{R} $ contains the compact subsets of $ G $, it follows that $ \mathscr{R} $ must be all of $ \mathscr{B} $. $\endgroup$ – Transcendental Oct 26 '16 at 5:06
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that's right. $\endgroup$ – Eric Wofsey Oct 26 '16 at 5:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.