3
$\begingroup$

Let $S_2$ be an orientable regular surface and $f:S_1\to S_2$ be a differentiable map which is a local diffeomorphism at every $p\in S_1$. Prove that $S_1$ is orientable.

My attemp: Suppose that $S_2$ is oriented by $N_2$ (since all orientable surface has a vector field of unit vectors N, we can assume that $S_2$ is oriented by $N_2$), and let $\{\varphi_{\lambda}:U_\lambda\to S_1\}_{\lambda\in\Gamma}$ a family of coordinate neighborhood of $S_1$.

Since $f$ is a local diffeomorphism, then $df_p$ is injective, but in particular $T_{f(p)}(S_2)=df_p(T_p S_1)$, and if is necessary we interchange $u$ and $v$, we can assume $$\left\langle df_p\left(\dfrac{\partial\varphi_{\lambda}}{\partial u}\right)\wedge df_p\left(\dfrac{\partial\varphi_{\lambda}}{\partial v}\right) ,N_2\right\rangle_{f(p)}>0\qquad (*)$$

Now, such $\{\varphi_{\lambda}\}_{\lambda\in\Gamma}$ is an orientation of $S_1$.

Suppose that $\varphi_{\alpha},\varphi_{\beta}\in\{\varphi_{\lambda}\}_{\lambda\in\Gamma}$ and such that $\varphi_{\alpha}(r,s)\cap\varphi_{\alpha}(u,v)\neq0$. Now, for the change of cordinates we have $$(\varphi^{-1}_{\alpha}\circ\varphi_{\beta})(r,s)=(u(r,s),v(r,s))\implies \varphi_{\beta}(r,s)=\varphi_{\alpha}((u(r,s),v(r,s)))$$ Then, $$\dfrac{\partial\varphi_{\beta}}{\partial r}=\dfrac{\partial\varphi_{\alpha}}{\partial u}\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial r}+\dfrac{\partial\varphi_{\alpha}}{\partial v}\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial r}$$

$$\dfrac{\partial\varphi_{\beta}}{\partial s}=\dfrac{\partial\varphi_{\alpha}}{\partial u}\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial s}+\dfrac{\partial\varphi_{\alpha}}{\partial v}\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial s}$$

So, $df\left(\dfrac{\partial\varphi_{\beta}}{\partial r}\right)\wedge df\left(\dfrac{\partial\varphi_{\beta}}{\partial s}\right)=\dfrac{\partial(u,v)}{\partial(r,s)}df\left(\dfrac{\partial\varphi_{\alpha}}{\partial u}\right)\wedge df\left(\dfrac{\partial\varphi_{\alpha}}{\partial v}\right)$. Therefore,

$$0<\left\langle df\left(\dfrac{\partial\varphi_{\beta}}{\partial r}\right)\wedge df\left(\dfrac{\partial\varphi_{\beta}}{\partial s}\right) ,N_2\right\rangle=\dfrac{\partial(u,v)}{\partial(r,s)}\left\langle df\left(\dfrac{\partial\varphi_{\alpha}}{\partial u}\right)\wedge df\left(\dfrac{\partial\varphi_{\alpha}}{\partial v}\right),N_2\right\rangle$$ Which implies that $\dfrac{\partial(u,v)}{\partial(r,s)}>0$ and a regular surface is say "orientable" if is possible cover it with a family of coordinates neighborhood such that if a point belongs two differents coordinates family then, the change of coordinates has positive jacobian in such point.

The solution of this problem looks fine to me, but I have the little problem that is, if is always possible say that $\left\langle df_p\left(\dfrac{\partial\varphi_{\lambda}}{\partial u}\right)\wedge df_p\left(\dfrac{\partial\varphi_{\lambda}}{\partial v}\right) ,N_2\right\rangle_{f(p)}>0$.

My Attemp: If I have a basis for $T_{p}(S_1)$, $\{\varphi_u,\varphi_v\}$, and $df_p:T_p(S_1)\to T_{f(p)}(S_2)$ is a injective linear map, then $\{df_p(\varphi_u),df_p(\varphi_v)\}$ is linearly independent in $T_{f(p)}(S_2)$, i.e., a basis for $T_{f(p)}(S_2)$. Now, we can define a positive basis if $$\left\langle df_p(\varphi_u)\wedge df_p(\varphi_v), N_2 \right\rangle>0$$ Because a orientation $N_2$ on $S_2$ induces an orientation on each tangent space $T_{f(p)}(S_2)$. This is right?. Thanks!

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ I don't know what you mean by "oriented by N," but the fact that $f$ is a local diffeomorphism tells you that $df_p$ maps $T_pS_1$ isomorphically to $T_{f(p)}S_2$. $\endgroup$ – Ted Shifrin Oct 21 '16 at 2:13
  • $\begingroup$ @TedShifrin Hi! thanks for your answer, this is exactly what I wanna prove. If $f$ is a local diffeomorphism then $df_p$ mas $T_pS_1$ isomorphically to $T_{f(p)}S_2$, thanks $\endgroup$ – MathUser Oct 21 '16 at 3:43
  • $\begingroup$ A local diffeomorphism $f$ has a local inverse $g$, so write down the chain rule (for both $g\circ f$ and $f\circ g$) and see that $df_p$ is an invertible linear map onto its image. (Clearly, $df_p(T_pS_1\subset T_{f(p)}S_2$, but you'll show they have the same dimension. Indeed, you only need $df_p$ maps onto, so you'll need only one of the equations you get from the chain rule.) $\endgroup$ – Ted Shifrin Oct 21 '16 at 3:47
  • $\begingroup$ @TedShifrin I wrote that mean "Oriented by $N_2$", You believe that the answer is right? $\endgroup$ – MathUser Oct 24 '16 at 3:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ OK. Then it seems fine to me :) $\endgroup$ – Ted Shifrin Oct 24 '16 at 14:43
1
+25
$\begingroup$

Orientability can be defined in various ways. I'll stick to the following (alluded to in your question): An abstract two-dimensional surface $S$ is orientable if we can select an atlas for $S$ such that all transition maps have positive Jacobian wherever defined.

We are given an orientable surface $S_2$ (maybe embedded in ${\mathbb R}^3$). Let $\bigl(V_\beta,\psi_\beta\bigr)_{\beta\in J}$ be an atlas for $S_2$ with patches $V_\beta\subset S_2$ and coordinate functions $\psi_\beta:\>V_\beta\to{\mathbb R}^2$, such that all transition maps $\psi_{\beta'}\circ\psi_\beta^{-1}$ have positive Jacobian wherever defined.

In addition we are given a surface $S_1$ and a differentiable map $f:\>S_1\to S_2$ which is locally a diffeomorphism. We then may choose an atlas $\bigl(U_\alpha,\phi_\alpha\bigr)_{\alpha\in I}$ for $S_1$, such that for each $\alpha\in I$ the restriction $f\restriction U_\alpha$ maps $U_\alpha$ diffeomorphically into $V_\beta$ for a suitably chosen $\beta=\beta_\alpha$. The map $$f_{\alpha\beta}:=\psi_\beta\circ( f\restriction U_\alpha)\circ \phi_\alpha^{-1}: \qquad(x,y)\mapsto(u,v)$$ has nonzero Jacobian throughout, and after renumbering the output variables $(x,y)$ of $\phi_\alpha$ (if necessary) we may assume that this Jacobian is positive. Note that our assumption on the $\psi_\beta$ guarantees that the resulting numbering is independent of the $\beta$ we have chosen for this particular $\alpha$.

When the necessary renumberings have been performed all transition maps $\phi_{\alpha'}\circ\phi_\alpha^{-1}$, being compositions of ${\mathbb R}^2\to{\mathbb R}^2$ maps with positive Jacobian, have positive Jacobian as well.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your answer, but I think, if I prove that $(*)$ is always true, then my answer will be correct, can give me some hint to show this, thanks! $\endgroup$ – MathUser Oct 25 '16 at 19:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.