7
$\begingroup$

The collection of all degree-$n$ polynomials in the variable $w$ (call this set $\mathbb{C}[w]_n$) can be identifies with $\mathbb{C}^{n+1}$ by the bijection $F:\mathbb{C}^{n+1}\to\mathbb{C}[w]_n$ defined by $$F:(a_0,a_1,\ldots,a_n)\mapsto w=p(z)=a_0+a_1z+\cdots+a_nz^n.$$ Let $\mathcal{A}_n\subset\mathbb{C}^{n+1}$ denote the set of polynomials (using the above identification) defined by saying that $p(z)\in\mathcal{A}_n$ if and only if each branch of the inverse $z=p^{-1}(w)$ is expressible as an explicit formula using finitely many algebraic operations (ie addition/subtraction, multiplication/division, and roots). That is, something like $$z=p^{-1}(w)=\sqrt{w+\sqrt{2/w}}.$$ Note that for any polynomial $p(z)\in\mathbb{C}^{n+1}$, either each branch of $p^{-1}$ is so expressible, or none is (since every branch can be reached as an analytic continuation of any other).

My Question: What is the structure of $\mathcal{A}_n$ in $\mathbb{C}^{n+1}$? Is it an algebraic variety? What is its dimension? What can we say about its topology?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ are you basically asking about the polynomials that are solvable in radicals ? $\endgroup$ – mercio Aug 4 '18 at 20:08
  • $\begingroup$ @mercio, yes, that is right. $\endgroup$ – Trevor J Richards Aug 5 '18 at 22:59
2
$\begingroup$

So you are asking if we can tell when an extension $\Bbb C(w = p(z)) \subset \Bbb C(z)$ is solvable by radicals, so you want to study the Galois group of that extension and see if it is a solvable group. The answer to your question is that yes, this can be given by algebraic equations.

This is a pretty geometric question, because there is a correspondance between extensions of $\Bbb C(w)$ of dimension $n$ and $n$-sheeted branched coverings of the Riemann sphere, and the Galois group in the algebraic side corresponds to the group of deck transformations in the geometric side.

If you choose a finite subset $\{w_1 ; \ldots ; w_k\}$ of the Riemann sphere and fix some non-intersecting branch cuts between $w_0$ and each $w_i$, then you can make a new Riemann surface by building an $n$-sheeted covering branched at those points, by appropriately choosing permutations of the branches $\alpha_i$ when looping around each of the $w_i$. Given a $k$-uple of elements of $S_n$ $\alpha = (\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_k)$, the corresponding covering is connected if and only if the subgroup $G_\alpha$ of $S_n$ generated by the $\alpha_i$ is transitive. If so the covering defines a Riemann surface, and the meromorphic functions on it are a field extension of $\Bbb C(w)$ with Galois group $G_\alpha$.
Finally, two $k$-uples $\alpha^1,\alpha^2$ give isomorphic coverings if they are the same after reordering the sheets, that is, if there is a $\beta \in S_n$ such that $\alpha_i^1 = \beta \alpha_i^2 \beta^{-1}$ for $i \in \{1 \cdots k\}$, so we will only be interested in equivalence classes with regard to this. Let us denote this relation with $\sim$.

So to understand the Galois group of polynomial maps we simply have to look at their possible branching data.

Because polynomials have an $n$-uple pole at infinity (around which a loop makes an $n$-cycle permutation of the sheets), there is an $n-1$-uple branch point above $w_n = \infty$, and there are another $n-1$ branch points (counted with multiplicity) above the critical values of $p$, that is the $w_i = p(z_i)$ where the $z_i$ are the critical points of $p$, the points where $p'(z)$ vanishes.
Generically, those $n-1$ critical values are all distinct and the loops induce simple transpositions there, so the choice of the branching data amounts to the choice of $n-1$ transpositions the composition of which give an $n$-cycle.
Let $T_n \subset S_n$ be the subset of transpositions, and let $G_n = \{ (\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_{n-1}) \in T_n^{n-1} \mid \alpha_1\cdots \alpha_{n-1} = (123\cdots n)\} / \sim$, the set of possible polynomial branching data on $n-1$ distinct branch points.

In the non-generic case, some critical values have higher multiplicity, and you can obtain their data by starting with a generic one and composing some of the transpositions together. This is also the only way that the group can possibly be smaller than $S_n$.

For every such branching data, the covering will be a Riemann surface of genus $0$, so another Riemann sphere, and by deciding that the preimage of $w_n = \infty$ should be $z_n = \infty$ the covering becomes a polynomial map. Two polynomial maps give the same branching data if and only if they differ by pre-composition with an automorphism of the Riemann sphere, and since polynomials fix $\infty$, they have to differ by a map of the form $z_1 = az_2+b$ from some nonzero $a \in \Bbb C$. Then, if we restrict ourselves to polynomials with $a_n=1$ and $a_{n-1}=0$, then for $n \ge 3$ there are exactly $n$ possible polynomials $p(z), p(\zeta_n z), p(\zeta^2 z)$ etc (for $n=2$ there is only one because if $p(x) = x^2+a_0$, $p(-x) = p(x)$).

Let $g_n$ be the cardinal of $G_n$. Geometrically, the space of polynomials (up to precomposition) is a $g_n$-sheeted branched covering of $Sym^{n-1}(\Bbb C)$, and we again have an isomorphism of groups between the (very large !!) Galois group and the deck transformations of that covering. This group, as a subgroup of permutations of $G_n$, is generated by the $n-2$ operations you get by replacing $(\alpha_i, \alpha_{i+1})$ with $(\alpha_i\alpha_{i+1}\alpha_i^{-1},\alpha_i)$ (think of this as moving two critical values in order to swap them). For $G_n$, it is transitive, but that won't be the case when you start merging elements of $\alpha$, then the number of orbits tells you the number of components you should expect.


Now let us go to the algebraic side.

Given a degree $n$ polynomial $p(z) = \sum_{i=0}^n a_i z^i$, if you denote $z_1 \ldots z_{n-1}$ the critical points, and $w_1,\ldots,w_{n-1}$ the critical values, then the polynomial expression $q(w) = \prod_{i=1}^{n-1} (w - w_i) = \prod_{i=1}^{n-1} (w - p(z_i))$ is symmetric in the $z_i$.
Call $b_i$ the coefficients of $q$ ($q(w) = w^{n-1} + \sum_{i=0}^{n-2} b_i w^i$).
Given that $p'(z) = na_n \prod (z - z_i)$, it is possible to express $b_i$ as polynomial expressions in terms of $p'(z)/na_n$, which are themselves algebraic in the $a_i$.

When you assume $a_{n-1}=0$ and $a_n=1$, they become polynomial in the $a_i$, and the field extension $K_n = \Bbb C(q_0,\ldots,q_{n-2}) \subset L_n = \Bbb C(a_0,a_1, \ldots, a_{n-2})$ has finite degree $d_n$. From what we know of the geometric side, we should have $d_n = n g_n$ for $n \ge 3$ and for $n = 2$, $d_n = g_n$.
(it is possible to compute $d_n = n^{n-2}$, so $g_n = n^{n-3}$ for $n \ge 3$)

The places where this cover can branch is when two critical values coincide, which means when the discriminant $\Delta$ of $q$ vanishes. Meanwhile, the only chance for your polynomial to not have Galois group $S_n$ is when you merge some critical values together in order to push all of the generators of the deck transformation into a subgroup of your choice. And this gives a polynomial equation $\Delta_n(a_0, \ldots, a_{n-2}) = 0$ that has to vanish for your polynomial to be non-generic.

There is a lot of information encoded in the discriminant $\Delta_n(a_0, \ldots,a_{n-2})$. It doesn't actually depend on $a_0$. The number of components and how they intersect themselves or each other into a number of singularity loci and so on all can all be described combinatorially on the geometric side.

The discriminant of $p'$ has to divide it three times (because if two critical points coincide, then two critical values will also coincide, and do so by making a $3$-cycle holonomy).
Its other irreducible factors have exponent $2$ (there is one for each geometrically different way to merge two commuting critical values).

At this point I should illustrate with what happens for small $n$

I don't know how to easily get nice systems of equations for the lower dimensional pieces, nor do I know how to interpret the various multiplicites you see in the geometric/combinatoric side into algebraic statements (at least in the case $n=5$, I did see lots of factorisations happening)


degree $2$ : $p(z) = z^2 + a_0$

$G_2$ only has one element, $[(12)]$, so $g_2=1,d_2=1$ and so $K_2 = L_2$.
There is only one possible geometry here. Given a critical value $w_1$, there is only one $2$-sheeted covering branched at $w_1$ and $\infty$, and there is only one possible polynomial, $p(z) = z^2 + w_1$.


degree $3$ : $p(z) = z^3 + a_1z + a_0$

Again $G_3$ is the singleton $[(12),(23)]$, so we have $g_3=1$ and $d_3=3$.

Some quick computation shows that
$b_1 = -2a_0, b_0 = a_0^2 + 4a_1^3/27 : K_3 = \Bbb C(a_0, a_1^3)$.

$\Delta_3(a_0,a_1) = b_1^2 - 4b_0 = 4a_1^3/27$, so it only contains the cube of the discriminant of $p'$, as expected.

The Galois group of $p$ is $S_3$ unless $a_1=0$ and then it is a cyclic group of order $3$.


degree $4$ : $p(z) = z^4 + a_2z^2 + a_1z + a_0$

Now things start getting a bit more interesting : $G_4 = \{[(12),(23),(34)],[(12),(23),(24)],[(12),(23),(14)],[(12),(34),(13)]\}$.

Merging two critical values gives two orbits, that of $[(123),(34)]$ and that of $[(12)(34),(13)]$, which reflects the factorisation $\Delta_4 = (-27a_1^2-8a_2^3)^3 a_1^2/2^{16}$.

If the first factor vanishes the Galois group is still $S_4$, but if $a_1$ vanishes then the Galois group of $p$ is the diedral group of order $8$. If both vanish ($a_1=a_2=0$) then you get a cyclic group of order $4$

Also note that the curve $(-27a_1^2-8a_2^3)=0$ is pinched at $a_1=a_2=0$.


degree $5$ : $p(z) = z^5 + a_3z^3 + a_2z^2 + a_1z + a_0$.

The number of branching data is increasing quickly, since now $G_5$ has $25$ elements (in a single orbit) So $L_5$ should be an extension of degree $125$ of $K_5$ (I didn't check that).

Moving down a dimension, all the possible ways to merge two critical values fall (again, and forever) in two orbits, which reflects the factorisation (up to a multiplicative constant)

$\Delta_5 = (-16a_3^6+224a_3^4a_1-88a_3^3a_2^2-1040a_3^2a_1^2+360a_3a_2^2a_1+135a_2^4+1600a_1^3)^2 \times \\ (-81a_3^4a_1+27a_3^3a_2^2+360a_3^2a_1^2-540a_3a_2^2a_1+135a_2^4-400a_1^3)^3$

The surface $S_1$ given by the first factor corresponds to the orbit of $[(12),(24),(23)(45)]$, while the surface $S_2$ corresponds to the orbit of $[(12),(23),(345)]$.

Polynomials falling on any smooth point of the $\Delta_5=0$ surfaces still have Galois Group $S_5$

Going down a dimension, we now get five orbits, so five curves. (by the way, the curves will always have genus $0$ because they are branched coverings of the Riemann sphere with only two branch points).
Hopefully, I paired the curves with the orbits properly :

$[(12), (2345)]$ : where $S_1$ and $S_2$ intersect and $S_2$ is singular.
It is parametrized with $p(z) = z^5-10t^2z^3+20t^3z^2-15t^4z+a_0$.
The Galois group is $S_5$.

$[(13), (345)(12)]$ : where $S_1$ and $S_2$ intersect and $S_1$ is singular.
It is parametrized with $p(z) = z^5-15t^2z^3+10t^3z^2+60t^4z+a_0$.
The Galois group is $S_5$.

$[(123), (345)]$ : where $S_2$ intersects itself.
It is parametrized with $p(z) = z^5+10tz^3+45t^2z+a_0$.
The Galois group is $A_5$.

$[(124), (45)(23)]$ : where $S_1$ and $S_2$ intersect transversally.
It is parametrized with $p(z) = z^5+30t^2z^3+100t^3z^2+105t^4z+a_0$.
The Galois group is $A_5$.

$[(23)(14), (45)(13)]$, where $S_1$ intersects itself.
It is parametrized with $p(z) = z^5+5tz^3+5t^2z+a_0$.
The Galois group is the diedral group of order $10$, so there you have your solvable degree $5$ polynomials.

Down another dimension, you end up at the point $(a_1=a_2=a_3=0)$, at the intersection of every curve, the Galois group there is cyclic of order $5$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.