I was trying to come up with a dice game which makes the players' intuition fail.

The game has two dice. Player $A$ and player $B$ have different victory conditions. Player $A$ and $B$ alternate tossing the dice. Player $A$ needs to throw two consecutive $6$ to win. Player $B$ throws both dice together and needs to roll double sixes.

The expected number of rolls for player $B$ before winning is $36$. For player $A$, it is $42$. Should this be enough to convince someone to play as player $B$?


What is the probability that player A wins?

Well, if has not yet rolled a 6 (as is the case at the beginning), $p = \frac{35}{36}(\frac{1}{6}p'+\frac{5}{6}p)$, and if he has rolled a 6, $p'= \frac{1}{6}+\frac{5\cdot 35}{216}p$. Solving this yields


Note that this calculation assumes that A gets to roll first. Otherwise, multiply by an extra factor of $\frac{35}{36}$ to obtain


So in either case B is clearly better off.

  • $\begingroup$ So it seems rational to take a $(8,10)\%$ chance edge in the game? Is this really enough to "run a gambling circle and make profit"? $\endgroup$ – Cehhΐro Oct 16 '16 at 21:40
  • $\begingroup$ If you play it enough times, yes. $\endgroup$ – ruadath Oct 16 '16 at 21:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.