1
$\begingroup$

Is there a ring $R$ with zero Krull-dimension such that $R$ has neither nonzero idempotent nor nilpotent ideals?

I know that this ring could not be Noetherian, because if this is so, then $R$ would be Artinian and hence, the Jacobson radical would be nilpotent. (Of course, this is a contradiction if the Jacobson radical is non-zero.)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Presumably you also want $R$ to not be a field? $\endgroup$ – Eric Wofsey Oct 11 '16 at 7:46
  • $\begingroup$ $R$ is always nonzero idempotent, so I guess you mean to exclude that? $\endgroup$ – rschwieb Oct 11 '16 at 19:57
2
$\begingroup$

If $R$ is zero-dimensional then $\operatorname{Spec} R$ is totally disconnected. Since idempotent elements of $R$ correspond to clopen subsets of $\operatorname{Spec} R$, this means that if $R$ has no nontrivial idempotent ideals, $\operatorname{Spec} R$ is a point. This means that $R$ has a unique prime ideal, which is equal to its nilradical. If $R$ has no nontrivial nilpotent ideals, this means the nilradical is $0$. Thus $0$ is the unique prime ideal of $R$ and in particular is maximal, which means $R$ is a field.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ How do we deduce from "$R$ has no nilpotent ideals" that $R$ has zero nilradical? $\endgroup$ – karparvar Oct 13 '16 at 4:14
  • $\begingroup$ If $r\in R$ is a nonzero nilpotent, then $(r)$ is a nonzero nilpotent ideal. $\endgroup$ – Eric Wofsey Oct 13 '16 at 4:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.