0
$\begingroup$

In one of IEEE journal I have seen the following equation to be true $$2\pi \lambda\int_v^{\infty}r^{1-\beta}e^{-\pi\lambda r^2}dr=(\pi \lambda)^{\frac{\beta}{2}}\gamma\left(\pi\lambda v^2,1-\frac{\beta}{2}\right)$$when I use substitution $h=\pi \lambda r^2$ then my answer turns out to be as follows $$2\pi \lambda\int_v^{\infty}r^{1-\beta}e^{-\pi\lambda r^2}dr=(\pi \lambda)^{\frac{\beta}{2}}\Gamma\left(\pi\lambda v^2,1-\frac{\beta}{2}\right)$$ which is similar in appearance as the first equation except we now have Upper incomplete Gamma function. I want to know whether my answer is wrong or there is some pen mistake in the IEEE journal. Thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I get your solution with the upper incomplete gamma function. It appears that there is a misprint in the journal article. $\endgroup$ – poweierstrass Oct 11 '16 at 11:26
  • $\begingroup$ @poweierstrass I found that the solution with upper gamma function is also not applicable to all possible values of $\beta$. Just wanted to share it with you $\endgroup$ – Frank Moses Oct 17 '16 at 8:45
  • $\begingroup$ I know. The incomplete gamma functions are tricky regarding allowable values of the argument, integration paths, and analytic continuation. See DLMF (dlmf.nist.gov/8.2) and Volume 1 of Higher Transcendental Functions (Bateman Manuscript) (resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20140123-104529738) for details. $\endgroup$ – poweierstrass Oct 17 '16 at 11:14
  • $\begingroup$ yes exactly. in this dlmf page you can see that real part of $a$ should be greater than zero. that is what i was talking about $\endgroup$ – Frank Moses Oct 17 '16 at 11:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.