Just as in the title: I've seen the statement that Artinian rings are Noetherian several times (eg Commutative artinian ring is noetherian) but if we take $R=\oplus_\mathbb{N}\mathbb{Z}_2$, it seems it is artinian but not Noetherian:

Indeed, given any decreasing sequence $I_n$ of ideals, choose $k$ for which $I_1\subseteq\mathbb{Z}_2^k$. This is a finite ring, so the sequence stabilizes.

However, the increasing sequence of ideals $J_n=\mathbb{Z}_2^n$ does not stabilize.

Where is my mistake?

  • $\begingroup$ There are ideals not contained in $\mathbb Z_2^k$ for any $k$, for example $\mathrm{Ann}(J_n)=\{x\in R\mid x_i=0\text{ for }i\leq n\}$. $\endgroup$ – stewbasic Oct 9 '16 at 22:12

First of all, it is only true that all Artinian rings are Noetherian if "ring" means "unital ring". Since your ring $R$ is not unital, what you have written does not actually give a contradiction.

However, $R$ in fact is not Artinian. The reason is that there need not exist $k$ such that $I_1\subseteq \mathbb{Z}_2^k$. For instance, $I_1$ might be the ideal generated by $e_{2n}$ for each $n\in\mathbb{N}$, where $e_i$ is the element of $R$ whose $i$th coordinate is $1$ and all other coordinates are $0$. You can then get a descending chain of ideals by one-by-one removing one of the generators from this $I_1$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.