In my lecture notes about Inverse Function Theorem it said

There is no need to have an Inverse Function Theorem for functions $F : \mathbb R^n → \mathbb R^m$. If we only require $F$ and $F^{-1}$ to be continuous (not necessarily differentiable), then we can still conclude m = n."

Does it mean that for $F: \mathbb R^n → \mathbb R^m$ which has an inverse function $F^{-1}:\mathbb R^m → \mathbb R^n$, says $F$ is differentiable at $a\in \mathbb R^n$ and $F^{-1}$ is differentiable at $b=F(a)\in \mathbb R^m$,then $m$ must be equal to $n$? Why is it true?


The Inverse Function Theorem requires a continuously differentiable function.

Your assumption is true. The Invariance of Domain Theorem says that $F$ cannot be bijective and continuous if $m\neq n$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.