I would like to show that $\mathbb Z[x]/\left<x\right>$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb Z[x]/\left<x-1\right>$, and hence show that $\mathbb Z[x]/\left<x-1,p\right>$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb Z_p$.

I am completely new to ring theory. Could someone illustrate for me step-by-step

  1. How can I define a map?

  2. How can I show that the map is surjective?

  3. How can I apply the first isomorphism theorem?

Why is $\mathbb{Z}[x]/(1-x,p)$ isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}_{p}$, where $p$ is a prime integer.

How to show $\mathbb{Z}[x]/\left<2,x\right>$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb{Z}_2$

$\mathbb Z [X] / (X)$ isomorphic to $\mathbb Z[X] / (X+1)$ isomorphic to $\mathbb Z [X] / (X+2015)$

These are proofs related to my questions, but I am not able to understand them so far...

Thank so much!!!


Let's try the following. Define:

$$\begin{cases}\phi:\Bbb Z[x]\to\Bbb Z\;,\;\;\phi(f(x)):=f(0)\\{}\\ \psi:\Bbb Z[x]\to\Bbb Z\;,\;\;\psi(f(x)):=f(1)\end{cases}$$

Check both maps above are ring homomorphisms, they both are surjective, and also

$$\ker\phi=\{f(x)\in\Bbb Z[x]\;/\;f(0)=0\}=\langle x\rangle\;,\;\;\ker\psi=\{f(x)\in\Bbb Z[x]\;/\;f(1)=0\}=\langle x-1\rangle$$

and now apply the first isomorphism theorem (rings version) to the above to get isomorphisms

$$\Bbb Z[x]/\langle x\rangle\cong\Bbb Z\;,\;\;\Bbb Z[x]/\langle x-1\rangle\cong\Bbb Z$$

so now just compose one of the above isomorphisms with the inverse map of the other one to get what you want:

$$\Bbb Z[x]/\langle x\rangle\cong\Bbb Z[x]/\langle x-1\rangle$$

For the rest, you can show first that

$$\Bbb Z[x]/\langle 1-x,\,p\rangle\cong\left(\Bbb Z[x]/\langle \,p\,\rangle\right)/\left(\langle1-x,\,p\rangle/\langle\,p\,\rangle\right)$$

using the third (or second or something) isomorphism theorem, and then show

$$\begin{cases}\Bbb Z[x]/\langle \,p\,\rangle\cong\Bbb Z_p[x]\\{}\\\langle1-x,\,p\rangle/\langle\,p\,\rangle\cong\langle1-x\rangle\end{cases}$$

Further hints: check the maps

$$f(x)\mapsto f(x)\pmod p\;,\;\;f(x)(1-x)+g(x)p\mapsto f(x)$$

  • $\begingroup$ Em... So far I haven't encountered the second or third isomorphism theorem. So is it possible to regard this question just by the viewpoint of the first isomorphism theorem? $\endgroup$ – PropositionX Oct 3 '16 at 21:38
  • $\begingroup$ @Y.X. If you haven't studied yet the other isomorphism theorems then I really have no idea how to help you. Perhaps it is possible without that, but I don't know how. $\endgroup$ – DonAntonio Oct 3 '16 at 22:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.