elementary abelian subgroup of finite non-cyclic $p$-group [closed]

Let $G$ be a finite non-cyclic $p$-group of order $p^n$, $n >1$, where $p$ is odd prime. I need to prove(By elementary methods)that $G$ has a subgroup isomorphic to $\Bbb{Z}_p \times \Bbb{Z}_p$?

closed as off-topic by user26857, Namaste, Parcly Taxel, Jean-Claude Arbaut, JMPOct 11 '16 at 6:25

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

• "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – user26857, Namaste, Parcly Taxel, Jean-Claude Arbaut, JMP
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

• This is not true unless you also assume that $p > 2$. – Tobias Kildetoft Sep 30 '16 at 10:29
• why? i think it is correct – Rima Sep 30 '16 at 10:30
• Then you should look at some examples of $2$-groups. – Tobias Kildetoft Sep 30 '16 at 10:31
• @TobiasKildetoft Also I think it is correct for any prime $\;p\;$. Do you have some counter example in mind? – DonAntonio Sep 30 '16 at 10:31
• @DonAntonio All the generalized quaternion groups (these are in fact precisely the counter examples). – Tobias Kildetoft Sep 30 '16 at 10:32

If $G$ is abelian, then $G$ has at least two distinct subgroups of order $p$ such as $H,K$. Thus $H \times K \cong \Bbb{Z}_p \times \Bbb{Z}_p$.
Now let $G$ is non-abelian. We use induction on $n$. If all maximal subgroups of $G$ are cyclic, then $G \cong Q_8$, a contradiction. Thus there exists a non-cyclic maximal subgroup of $G$ such as $H$. By induction hypothesis $H$ has a non-cyclic subgroup of order $p^2$. Thus $G$ has a non-cyclic subgroup of order $p^2$.
• Under what assumption on an abelian group $G$ are you assuming it has at least two distinct subgroups of order $p$? – Nex Oct 1 '16 at 18:35
• @Nex Because if $G$ is a finite abelian $p$-group such that $G$ has exactly one subgroup of order $p$, then $G$ is cyclic. – Rima Oct 2 '16 at 3:24