I have to sets of r.v. $X_1,X_2,\ldots X_n$, and $Y_1,Y_2,\ldots Y_n$. I have that the increments in both collections are independent. That is: $X_1,X_2-X_1,\ldots, X_n-X_{n-1}$ are independent, and $Y_1,Y_2-Y_1,\ldots, Y_n-Y_{n-1}$ are independent. I also have that the corresponding increments between X and Y have the same distribution. That is, $X_1$ and $Y_1$ have the same distribution, and $X_i-X_{i-1}$ have the same distribution as $Y_i-Y_{i-1}$, for $1< i\le n$.

I need to show that the vectors $(X_1,X_2,\ldots, X_n)$, and $(Y_1,Y_2,\ldots,Y_n)$ have the same distribution.

I think I almost had it, but I got a problem with measurability.

my attempt:

$P(X_1\in B_1,X_2\in B_2,\ldots,X_n \in B_n)\\=\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}I_{z_1\in B_1,z_2+z_1\in B_2,\ldots z_1+z_2+z_3+\cdots+z_{n-1}+z_n\in B_n}(z_1,z_2,\ldots,z_n)d\mu_{(X_1,X_2-X_1,\ldots ,X_n-X_{n-1})}$


$\\=\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}I_{z_1\in B_1,z_2+z_1\in B_2,\ldots z_1+z_2+z_3+\cdots+z_{n-1}+z_n\in B_n}(z_1,z_2,\ldots,z_n)d\mu_{X_1}d\mu_{X_2-X_1}\ldots d\mu_{X_n-X_{n-1}}$

same distribution of increments:

$\\=\int_{\mathbb{R}^n}I_{z_1\in B_1,z_2+z_1\in B_2,\ldots z_1+z_2+z_3+\cdots+z_{n-1}+z_n\in B_n}(z_1,z_2,\ldots,z_n)d\mu_{Y_1}d\mu_{Y_2-Y_1}\ldots d\mu_{Y_n-Y_{n-1}}$

$=P(Y_1\in B_1,Y_2\in B_2,\ldots,Y_n \in B_n)$

But in order for this to work I need that $\{(z_1,z_2,\ldots,z_n):z_1\in B_1, z_1+z_2 \in B_2, \ldots, z_1+z_2+\cdots+z_n \in B_n\} \in \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^n)$.

But is it clear that this set is Borel-measurable? If not, must I use another approach to solve the problem? Any hints?



$$\{(z_1,\ldots,z_n); z_1 \in B_1, \ldots, z_1+\ldots+z_n \in B_n\} = \bigcap_{k=1}^n \left\{(z_1,\ldots,z_n); \sum_{j=1}^k z_j \in B_k \right\}$$

and therefore it suffices to show that each set

$$\left\{(z_1,\ldots,z_n); \sum_{j=1}^k z_j \in B_k \right\}$$

is Borel measurable. This, however, follows from the fact that the mapping

$$(z_1,\ldots,z_n) \mapsto f_j(z) := \sum_{j=1}^k z_j$$

is Borel measurable (as it is continuous);

$$\left\{(z_1,\ldots,z_n); \sum_{j=1}^k z_j \in B_k \right\} = f_j^{-1}(B_k) \in \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R}^n)$$

for any $B_k \in \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})$.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.