6
$\begingroup$

Firstly, just to clarify my notation:

Let $Cl(V,q)$ denote the Clifford Algebra of a quadratic vector space $(V,q)$ and denote by $Cl(V,q)_{0\vert 1}$ the even/odd part in the $\mathbb{Z}_2$-grading of $Cl(V,q) = Cl(V,q)_0 \oplus Cl(V,q)_1$ of the Clifford-algebra.

Now for the subgroups $Pin(V,q) \subset Cl(V,q)$ and $Spin(V,q)\subset Cl(V,q)_0$ is is defined:

A pinor representation is the restriction of an irreducible representation of $Cl(V,q)$ onto $Pin(V,q)$. Similary a spinor representation is the restriction of an irreducible representation of $Cl(V,q)_0$ onto $Spin(V,q)$.

My question is: What is the reason in defining pinor/spinor-representations as the restrictions of Clifford algebra representations, rather then just as usual group-representations of the groups themselves?

Remark: "Physical" explanations (as: 'The so defined spinor fields wouldn't behave like spinors, since...') are also very welcome.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Where is your definition taken from? It would be helpful to add some reference. $\endgroup$ – KonKan Oct 1 '16 at 20:34
  • $\begingroup$ It is taken from the lecture notes to this course on spin geometry. $\endgroup$ – Peter Wildemann Oct 3 '16 at 11:42
  • $\begingroup$ Relevant link. $\endgroup$ – user301988 Oct 3 '16 at 22:02
1
$\begingroup$

I suspect that there is a matter of terminology involved here.

When speaking about "spinors" we do not exactly mean the elements of the group $Spin(V,q)$ but rather the elements of special vector spaces upon which Clifford algebras act. In other words, the terminology spinors imply the elements of some specific (Clifford algebra, Pauli matrices etc )-module.

On the other hand, you are right in the fact that these spinor representations are not the only representations of the $Spin(V,q)$ group. In fact these ones are faithful. They are the ones obtained by restriction from the action of the Clifford algebra on the spinor space (spinor module). You can have a more detailed look here for the definitions and the elementary properties implied (look mainly at the definitions and the proposition of the first page).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The pointer to the faithfulness actually answers my question pretty well, thanks! $\endgroup$ – Peter Wildemann Oct 3 '16 at 11:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.