0
$\begingroup$

So, I'm working with Knowledge Based Agents in an AI class, and we're deriving a proposition given a logic base in CNF. I've derived $\neg G$ using proof by resolution in the following partial chain: $$G \rightarrow (\neg A \vee F \vee \neg G) \wedge (\neg B \vee F \vee \neg G) \rightarrow \cdots$$ Given $G$, $(\neg A \vee F \vee \neg G) \wedge (\neg B \vee F \vee \neg G)$ reduces to $(\neg A \vee F) \wedge (\neg B \vee F)$ which simplifies to $(\neg A \wedge \neg B) \vee F$. Is there a logic symbol to show a reduction, or should I just keep it in English?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Is F a variable, or a truth-value representing "false"? I immediately took it to denote a contradictory statement, but please clarify it you meant for $F$ to be a variable. $\endgroup$ – Namaste Sep 25 '16 at 17:38
  • $\begingroup$ F is just a variable, I apologize for the confusion. $\endgroup$ – HDM Sep 25 '16 at 19:06
0
$\begingroup$

Some people use the $\LaTeX$ symbol \rightsquigarrow "$\large\rightsquigarrow$" for some kind of reduction. There is probably no universal convention, so you should define whatever notation you use.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.