3
$\begingroup$

Let $T:V \rightarrow W$ and $U:W \rightarrow Z$ be linear transformations. Give an example where $UT$ is one-to-one, but $U$ isn't. Give an example where $UT$ is onto, but $T$ isn't.

I know that in the first scenario, then $U$ must be one-to-one from a previous part of the question, and that $T$ must be onto in the second part of the problem.

I'm having trouble finding linear transformations for this because all the examples I can think of for the first part are a bijection.

I'm having similar problems for the second one, but where T is onto as well.

I think I can use the same set for all of these, like $V=W=Z$, but I can't think of any. I've done something similar, but with finite sets and normal functions. However, these sets must be infinite because they describe a vector space.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ If $T$ is not injective, then there exists some non zero vector $\mathbf v$ such that $T\mathbf v =\mathbf 0$, which means that $UT\mathbf v= \mathbf 0$ for a non zero vector $\mathbf v$. So $UT$ cannot be injective. $\endgroup$ – lEm Sep 23 '16 at 3:36
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, I mistyped that. $U$ is the one which is not injective there. Edited. $\endgroup$ – AndroidFish Sep 23 '16 at 3:46
  • $\begingroup$ You can't use the same space for all three. For the first one, you must have $T$ 1-1 but not onto, and then $U$ be 1-1 on the image of $T$ (but not on all of $W$. $\endgroup$ – Gerry Myerson Sep 23 '16 at 7:11
1
$\begingroup$

$UT$ is injective means that $UT\mathbf v=\mathbf 0$ iff $\mathbf v =\mathbf 0$. Then it means that $U\mathbf w=\mathbf 0$ is only possible if $\mathbf w$ does not belong to $\mathrm{im}(T)-\{\mathbf 0\}$. Also notice that $T$ must be injective as I commented before. So all you need to find is just an injectivr $T$ and a non-injective map $U$ such that $\mathrm{ker}(U) \cap \mathrm{im}(T)=\{\mathbf 0\}$.

I also consider the case where $V,W,Z$ are finite dimensional. In which case, $UT$ is injective if $\dim V \leq \dim Z$. For $T$ to be injective, I also need $\dim W \geq \dim V$.

A simple example (with respect to standard basis) could be: $T:\mathbb R^2 \to \mathbb R^4$ given by

$$\begin{pmatrix} 1&0 \\ 0&1 \\0&0 \\ 0&0 \end{pmatrix}$$

And take $U: \mathbb R^4 \to \mathbb R^3$

$$\begin{pmatrix} 1&1&0&0\\ -1&1&0&0 \\ 1&1&0&0 \end{pmatrix}$$

Check that $UT: \mathbb R^2 \to \mathbb R^3$ has the matrix: $$\begin{pmatrix} 1&1 \\ 1&-1 \\ 1&1\end{pmatrix}$$


Now use a similar argument for the second part, $UT$ is surjective but $T$ is not. $\forall \mathbf z \in Z$, there exists $\mathbf v \in V$ such that $UT \mathbf v =\mathbf z$. Take $\mathbf w \in \mathrm{im}(T) \neq W$, then $U \mathbf w= \mathbf z$ implies that $U$ must be surjective. $\dim (\mathrm{ker}(U)=\dim W-\dim (\mathrm {im}(U))$ implies that $U$ is also non injective.

It is logical to take $\dim W > \dim Z$ for $U$ to not be injective.

Let $U: \mathbb R^4 \to \mathbb R^2$ given by:

$$\begin{pmatrix} 1&0&0&0 \\ 0&1&0&0 \end{pmatrix}$$

Take $T: \mathbb R^3 \to \mathbb R^4$

$$\begin{pmatrix} 1&0&0 \\ 0&1&0 \\ 0&0&1 \\ 0&0&0 \end{pmatrix}$$

Verify that: $UT: \mathbb R^3 \to \mathbb R^2 $ is surjective.

$$\begin{pmatrix} 1 &0&0 \\ 0&1&0 \end{pmatrix}$$

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Take $V=W=Z=\mathbb R^{\mathbb N}$ the vector space of real sequences.

$U : (x_1, x_2, \dots) \mapsto (x_2, x_3, \dots)$ is the left shift operator and $T : (x_1, x_2, \dots) \mapsto (0, x_1, x_2, \dots)$ the right shift operator.

$U$ is not one-to-one and $T$ isn't onto. However $UT$ is the identity operator, so is one-to-one and onto.

For some more information, you can have a look here: MathCounterexamples.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ No need to go to infinite-dimensional vector spaces, though. $\endgroup$ – Gerry Myerson Sep 23 '16 at 7:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.