I know the definition of Determinant function that it is a mapping $D: \mathbb{K}^{n \times n} \rightarrow \mathbb{K}$ such that (i) $D$ is n-linear (ii) $D(A) = 0$, if two rows are equal (iii) $D(I) = 1$ for the identity matrix I. where $\mathbb{K}$ is a commutative ring and $\mathbb{K}^{n \times n}$ is the set of all $n \times n$ matrices.

Can anyone tell me by using the above definition of determinant function how to prove $det(AB) = det(A) det(B)$ and $det(A) = det(A^T)$?

  • $\begingroup$ I greatly doubt you can prove this important theorem only using the general properties of it you mention and without going through way more stuff... $\endgroup$ – DonAntonio Sep 19 '16 at 15:37
  • $\begingroup$ For this I have a definition of alternating n-linear function also, I tried to prove this with the help of this definition also but couldn't succeed. $\endgroup$ – Amanda Sep 19 '16 at 15:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Amanda: Too many "this" in your comment. Do you want to prove that $D$ is an alternating function from your definition? It's easy, just expand $D(\ldots,a+b,\ldots,a+b,\ldots)$. $\endgroup$ – Canis Lupus Sep 19 '16 at 16:00
  • $\begingroup$ I have defined $D(A) = D(A_1 A_2 .... A_n) = det(AB)$ and also proved that $D(A_1 A_2 .... A_n)$ is an alternating n-linear function. Whether it is correct to define $D(A) = det(AB)$? $\endgroup$ – Amanda Sep 19 '16 at 16:10
  • $\begingroup$ Now I understood. Thanks to all for the help :) $\endgroup$ – Amanda Sep 19 '16 at 16:11

Here is a sketch: fix $A$ and define $D(B) = detAB$. It is easy to show that $D$ preserves addition and scalar multiplication in the columns of $B$, and that D is alternating in the columns of $B$. Therefore, by uniqueness of the alternating, multilinear function, we must have $D(B)=D(I)\ detB=\ detAI\ detB=\ detA\ detB$.

Now use the $QR$ factorization of $A^T$ and what we have just proved, to show the second claim.

Yet another way would be to use your definition to show that the $det$ function $must$ have the form

$\displaystyle \sum_\lambda \operatorname{sgn} \left({\lambda}\right) b_{1 \lambda \left({1}\right)} b_{2 \lambda \left({2}\right)} \cdots b_{n \lambda \left({n}\right)}$ where the sum is taken over all permutations $\lambda:\left \{ 1,\cdots, n \right \}\to \left \{ 1,\cdots, n \right \}$

and from here use the arguments you are probably used to.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.