3
$\begingroup$

I had just now seen that the following is actually an axiom.

$$\text{The area of a triangle is }\;\frac 12\text{ base } \times \text{ height }$$

But how did we come up with the idea that the area of a triangle is given as by that?

Why not something else?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ It is not an axiom at all... $\endgroup$ – Mauro ALLEGRANZA Sep 18 '16 at 17:47
  • $\begingroup$ Wat it is then please explain $\endgroup$ – Marvel Maharrnab Sep 18 '16 at 17:52
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @MauroALLEGRANZA ... Whether it is an axiom of not depends on the particular development of geometry. $\endgroup$ – GEdgar Sep 18 '16 at 18:01
9
$\begingroup$

If you take a triangle whose base is horizontal, and make a second, rotated-by-180-degrees copy, you can move the flipped-over copy up next to the original to make a parallelogram. That parallelogram should have TWICE the area of the original triangle, right? Because it's made up of two copies.

Now I want to figure out the area of the parallelogram. I'm going to cut-and-paste in a way that doesn't change its area...and turn it into a rectangle whose width is the same as the base of the triangle, and whose height is the same as the height of the triangle. Its area is therefore $b \times h$, and so for the original triangle, we have$$ 2 \times Area = b \times h \\ Area = \frac{b \times h}{2} $$

I'm hoping the pictures below help you see this.

enter image description here

There's the question of "What's the starting point for defining area?", and one answer is "It all starts from the area of a box." Another is "It all starts from the area of a triangle". Both lead to the same notion of area, so to some degree it depends on what book you use.

An alternative reason for the definition is this: if you cut a bunch of pieces of paper with varying widths and heights, and record $b \times h / 2$, and then record the weight of the paper next to that, you'll find that the two columns you end up with are proportional. You can actually choose any (positive) constant of proportionality that you like to define a consistent notion of area, but it's nice for a 1 inch by 1 inch square to have area 1 square inch, which the $bh/2$ gives you, so most people settle on that.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ I knew that area of llgm comes from triangle not vise versa $\endgroup$ – Marvel Maharrnab Sep 18 '16 at 17:43
  • $\begingroup$ Interesting. How do you know that? If you mean "I know that Euclid did it that way," that's fine. If you mean "that's the order my textbook uses," then my answer above may be helpful to you (or not!). $\endgroup$ – John Hughes Sep 18 '16 at 17:51
  • $\begingroup$ Because i learnt area of triangle first then the area of llgm from it $\endgroup$ – Marvel Maharrnab Sep 18 '16 at 17:54
  • $\begingroup$ Cant we say right triangle Is the basis. Every triangle can be made in to sum of right triangles $\endgroup$ – user69468 Sep 18 '16 at 18:01
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ I learned about american food before I learned about french food, but french food came first (because France came first). :) Sometimes our personal experiences do not determine the facts, esp. in mathematics. If your question is "why did I learn stuff in this order?", that's really not a mathematical question, and we can't hope to answer it for you. The existence of an area-measurement function is one of the axioms of geometry, at least in one formulation; that the formula must be proportional to $bh$ isn't too hard to prove. That the coefficient must be $1/2$ is unprovable. $\endgroup$ – John Hughes Sep 18 '16 at 18:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.