Two ordinary fair dice (one red and one blue) are thrown.

Event A: The red die will show a 5 or a 6.

Event B: The sum of the two dice will be 7.

Event C: The sum of the two dice will be 8.

Using the test for independence: $$P(A\cap B) = P(A).P(B) $$ It can be seen that $A$ and $B$ are independent events whilst events $A$ and $C$ are not independent.

I can't understand why this is the case. I understand the mathematics but I can't understand the logic behind it. I drew out the sample space but I am none the wiser. Is there some intrinsic difference between events $B$ and $C$ that results in one being independent and the other not?


If the red die is 5 or 6 it doesn't reduce or increase the chance of the sum being 7 because every value the red die could be could lead to a sum of 7 with equal chance.

This can't be said of a sum of 8 though. Because if the red die would have been a 1, a sum of 8 is now impossible. By saying that the red die is a 5 or 6, we are increasing the chance of rolling an 8.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This highlights that it is helpful to think of independence $P(A \cap B) = P(A) P(B)$ as $P(A \cap B) / P(B) = P(A)$, i.e. that the conditional probability is the same as the original probability. (When $P(B) \not = 0$ clearly.) $\endgroup$ – Lorenzo Najt Sep 16 '16 at 13:13
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you turkeyhundt and AreaMan. I now understand. $\endgroup$ – Kantura Sep 16 '16 at 13:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.