Let $X$ be the sequence space of all sequences of the form $$ x =(x_1,x_2 ,x_3,\dots , x_n ,0,0 \dots ) $$ where $\forall i \in \mathbb{N}$ $x_i \in \mathbb{R}$

whose terms are all zero after some index

$(X, || .||_{\infty})$ is a Normed Space where $$||x||_{\infty} =\max _{i \in \mathbb{N}}|x_i|$$

Prove (or disprove ) if it is a complete norm space


Def complete space seq in x that is cauchy then converges in X

Def Cauchy $$\forall \epsilon >0 , \exists N \in \mathbb{N} ; n,m \geq N \Rightarrow || x_n -x_m|| < \epsilon $$

Def of convegence in Normed space $\lim_{n \to \infty }|| x_n||=x$ $$\forall \epsilon >0 , \exists N \in \mathbb{N} ; n\geq N \Rightarrow || x_n -x|| < \epsilon $$

Prop from Lecture notes

Let $p \in \mathbb{N}, \mathbb{R}^p$ is complete normed vector space if it is equipped with $|| .||_{\infty}$

Tried to play with $$ \begin{aligned}\begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{n} \\ 1 \\ 0 \\ \vdots\\0 \end{pmatrix}=x_n &&\text{and} &&x=\begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 1 \\ 0 \\ \vdots\\0 \end{pmatrix} \end{aligned}$$

I know that $x_n$ is cauchy because ${1/n}$ is cauchy. and $$ x_n -x_m = \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{n} -\frac{1}{m}\\ 0\\ 0 \\ \vdots\\0 \end{pmatrix}$$ and that should be cauchy. $x_n-x$ seems to converge using the definition of convergence. because

$$x_n-x =\begin{pmatrix} 1/n \\ 0 \\\ 0\\\ \vdots \end{pmatrix}$$

Having trouble coming up with a sequence that is cauchy in X and does not convege in X.

Want to say that since $(R^p,|| .||_\infty)$ is complete and $X \subset R^p$ then $X$ is complete but dont know that can be said.

  • $\begingroup$ There is also another (slightly more advanced) ammo which can be used to prove something even stronger: Theorem: The dimension of every Banach space is uncountable. Your space $X=c_{00}$ has a countable Hamel basis, so there is no norm on $X$ which can make it a complete space. $\endgroup$ – tree detective Sep 29 '16 at 17:07

For example $x_n= (1,1/2,\dots,1/n,0,\dots)$. Then $x_n$ is Cauchy, and $x_n\to x$ in $\ell_{\infty}$ sense where $x=(1,1/2,1/3,...,1/n,1/(n+1),\dots)$ but $x\notin X$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.