Show $\det (A) \det(B)=\det(matrix)$ [closed]

Given, $$A= \left(\begin{matrix} a_{1,1}&a_{1,2} \\ a_{2,1}&a_{2,2} \\ \end{matrix}\right)$$

$$B= \left(\begin{matrix} b_{1,1}&b_{1,2} \\ b_{2,1}&b_{2,2} \\ \end{matrix}\right)$$

Show $$\det\left(\begin{matrix} A&0 \\ 0&B \\ \end{matrix}\right)=\det(A)\det(B)$$

I know how to solve the right side. But I wasn't sure about the left determinant. I tried to find out $\det(AB)$ where $AB$ is found by using matrix multiplication and I get

$$\det\left(\begin{matrix} a_{1,1}b_{1,1}+a_{1,2}b_{2,1}&a_{1,1}b_{1,2}+a_{1,2}b_{2,2}\\ a_{2,1}b_{1,1}+a_{2,2}b_{2,1}&a_{2,1}b_{1,2}+a_{2,2}b_{2,2} \\ \end{matrix}\right)$$

and I don't think this is right as this doesn't equal to the right side

closed as off-topic by Jendrik Stelzner, iadvd, Leucippus, Parcly Taxel, user91500Sep 14 '16 at 5:33

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

• "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Jendrik Stelzner, iadvd, Leucippus, Parcly Taxel, user91500
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

• Expand on the first row. – vadim123 Sep 13 '16 at 16:12

You can take a standard approach and just expand both sides of $\det (A)\det (B)=\det (AB)$ to see if the equation holds true.
Starting with the left side we have: \begin{align}\det (A)\det (B)&=(a_{1,1}a_{2,2}-a_{2,1}a_{1,2})(b_{1,1}b_{2,2}-b_{2,1}b_{1,2})\\&=a_{1,1}a_{2,2}b_{1,1}b_{2,2}-a_{1,1}a_{2,2}b_{2,1}b_{1,2}-b_{1,1}b_{2,2}a_{2,1}a_{1,2}+a_{2,1}a_{1,2}b_{1,2}b_{2,1}\end{align} For the right side we have: \begin{align}\det (AB)&=(a_{1,1}b_{1,1}+a_{1,2}b_{2,1})(a_{2,1}b_{1,2}+a_{2,2}b_{2,2})-(a_{2,1}b_{1,1}+a_{2,2}b_{2,1})(a_{1,1}b_{1,2}+a_{1,2}b_{2,2})\\&=a_{1,1}b_{1,1}a_{2,1}b_{1,2}+a_{1,1}b_{1,1}a_{2,2}b_{2,2}+a_{1,2}b_{2,1}a_{2,1}b_{1,2}+a_{1,2}b_{2,1}a_{2,2}b_{2,2}-a_{2,1}b_{1,1}a_{1,1}b_{1,2}-a_{2,1}b_{1,1}a_{1,2}b_{2,2}-a_{2,2}b_{2,1}a_{1,1}b_{1,2}-a_{2,2}b_{2,1}a_{1,2}b_{2,2}\\&=a_{1,1}b_{1,1}a_{2,2}b_{2,2}+a_{1,2}b_{2,1}a_{2,1}b_{1,2}-a_{2,1}b_{1,1}a_{1,2}b_{2,2}-a_{2,2}b_{2,1}a_{1,1}b_{1,2}\end{align} We can now see that the two sides do equal (messy but it works).
• That's correct, but you don't even have to expand the determinants. It's enough to notice that the matrix in the OP is actually $A B$. – dxiv Sep 13 '16 at 17:41
• @dxiv I took it as he/she is trying to show that $\det (A)\det (B)=\det (AB)$ without already assuming that fact about determinants. – Dave Sep 13 '16 at 17:45
• That is possible, of course. Given the title of the question, however, I don't know that the OP did in fact realize that the $matrix$ is actually $A B$. – dxiv Sep 13 '16 at 17:48
• @dxiv That is a good point. I suppose if they are able to use that property of determinants the question does just boil down to recognition that $matrix=AB$. – Dave Sep 13 '16 at 17:51