For a (finite) vector space $V$ and subspace $U \subset V$, my exercise sheet defines a function called an Inflation with $$I: (V/U)^* \to V^*$$ such that $$(Ig)(v) = g(v + U) ~~~~~~\forall v\in V ~~\text{and}~~g\in(V/U)^*.$$

I am confused why $g(v + U) \in V$? We want $I(g) \in V^*$ which means $I(g): V \to V$ but $$g(v + U) \notin V$$ but rather $$g(v + U) \in (V/U).$$ since $g: (V/U) \to (V/U)$.
This seems contradictory. What am I missing?


We want $I(g) \in V^*$ which means $I(g): V \to V$

No, the definition of $V^*$ is the space of linear maps from $V$ to the underlying field: $V\to \mathbb F$.


The map $I$ you want to define has domain $(V/U)^*$ and codomain $V^*$.

You want to define its action on $g\in (V/U)^*$ (so $g$ is a linear form on $V/U$): $Ig$ should be a linear form on $V$ and therefore you need to define its action on every element of $V$. The natural choice is $$ Ig\colon v\mapsto g(v+U) $$ because you know that $g(v+U)\in F$ (where $F$ is the field of scalars).

Now you have to prove:

  1. for every $g\in (V/U)^*$, $Ig\in V^*$ (that is, it is a linear map $Ig\colon V\to F$);

  2. $I$ is linear.

Both statements are easy verifications.

There is a different way to see this. Let $T\colon V\to W$ be a linear map. Then we can define $T^*\colon W^*\to V^*$ by defining, for $g\in W^*$, $$ T^*g\colon v\mapsto g(Tv) $$ In other words, $T^*g=g\circ T$ (map composition), which spares you verifying point 1 above.

The particular case of the inflation is when you consider $T\colon V\to V/U$, the canonical projection.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.