0
$\begingroup$

I have an exercise, it says proof that the limit at $\dfrac{1}{2}$ of the function $f(x) = \dfrac{1}{(2x-1)}$ doesn't exist.

1.- For any $L$ number, proof that a $K$ number exists so. $|L|+1=\dfrac{1}{2K-1}$

Here, what I did was find $K$, from that expression.

What I got was $K= \dfrac{2}{2|L|+1}$

But I'm not sure if that means the $K$ number I found satisfies what the are asking for. if not, then how can i found the value of $K$?

Then, it continues.

2.- Proof that $x\leq K$ implicates $|f(x)| \geq |L|+1$

Here, from the definition I suposed,that it must be $|f(x)| \ge \epsilon$ And if $\epsilon$ is equal to $1$ then $|f(x)| \ge |L| +1$ by canceling the absolute value from $|f(x)-L|\lt \epsilon$

They are similar but, how can i define the value of $x$?

3.- Show an $=x$ number so that $|x-\frac{1}{2}| \lt \delta$ and $|f(x)-L|\ge 1$

Actually I didn't knew what to do here.

4.- Finish the proof by choosing $\epsilon = 1$ and conclude the limit of the function doesn't exists.

When I was trying to solve it, I enclose $\delta$, so I could find the min of $\delta$. When I gave $\delta$ a value $1$, then by enclosing $|x-\frac{1}{2}| \lt \delta$, the result was $\delta = \min (1, -\frac{2\epsilon}{1})$ and that doesn't have sense. I thought that, the result of that was another way to proof the limit doesn't exist.

If someone can help me to solve my dudes, i would really appreciate it! Thanks

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

If $x = \frac12(1+y)$, then $\dfrac1{2x-1} =\dfrac1{2(\frac12(1+y))-1} =\dfrac1{y} $, so $\lim_{x \to \frac12} \dfrac1{2x-1} =\lim_{y \to 0} \dfrac1{y} $.

See if you can prove that this simpler limit does not exist.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

To show that $\lim_{x \to a}f(x)$ does not exist it is necessary to use the negation of definition of a limit and this means that we need to ensure that the following statement is true:

For any given number $L$ there is an $\epsilon > 0$ such that the implication $0 < |x - a| < \delta \Rightarrow |f(x) - L| < \epsilon$ is false for any value of $\delta > 0$.

Here the challenge to find an $\epsilon$ based on $L$ such that the desired implication is false no matter what value of $\delta > 0$ is chosen.

Here the function $f(x) = 1/(2x - 1)$ and $a = 1/2$ and your textbook desires to falsify the implication by trying to ensure that $|f(x) - L| \geq \epsilon$ for some value of $\epsilon > 0$. In order to do so it uses the inequality $|f(x) - L| \geq |f(x)| - |L|$ and thus we need to ensure that $|f(x)| \geq |L| + \epsilon$. Note that the textbook has chosen $\epsilon = 1$ so that $|f(x)| \geq |L| + 1$. This means that $|1/(2x - 1)| \geq |L| + 1$ or $|x - 1/2| \leq 1/2(|L| + 1)$. Now whatever $\delta > 0$ is chosen the inequality $0 < |x - 1/2| < \delta$ will also include values of $x$ such that $|x - 1/2| \leq 1/2(|L| + 1)$. And this will ensure that $|f(x) - L| \geq 1 = \epsilon$. Note that for this simple problem any value of $\epsilon > 0$ will work.

You should try to use similar technique to show that $\lim_{x \to 0}\sin(1/x)$ does not exist and here you will need to carefully choose value of $\epsilon$ based on $L$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.