10
$\begingroup$

If $R$ is a commutative ring with unity and $I$ is an ideal of $R$ then show that $(R/I)[x]\cong R[x]/I[x]$.

My effort: Define $\phi :R[x]\to (R/I)[x]$

$\phi(a_0+a_1x+a_2x^2+\cdots +a_nx^n)=(a_0+I)+(a_1+I)x+(a_2+I)x^2+\cdots +(a_n+I)x^n$

Obviously $\phi $ is a ring homomorphism and surjective.

$\ker \phi =\{a_0+a_1x+a_2x^2+\cdots +a_nx^n:\phi(a_0+a_1x+a_2x^2+\cdots +a_nx^n)=I\}$

So $(a_0+I)+(a_1+I)x+(a_2+I)x^2+\cdots +(a_n+I)x^n=I\implies a_i\in I\forall i$

So $\ker \phi=I[x]$

Is the proof correct? Please help.

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Correct. ${}{}$ $\endgroup$ – user26857 Sep 2 '16 at 15:04
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much @user26857 $\endgroup$ – Learnmore Sep 2 '16 at 15:15
  • $\begingroup$ Possible duplicate of $(R/I)[x]=R[x]/I$ $\endgroup$ – user531587 Nov 13 '18 at 23:06
  • $\begingroup$ @user531587 I voted to leave open because it's not clear if the older post you linked to is better (in terms of the question content and the answers content). But it's really a judgment call, and I'm sorry if you have a bigger plan. $\endgroup$ – Lee David Chung Lin Nov 14 '18 at 0:52
1
$\begingroup$

You definitely have the right idea, but what you've written isn't quite right. If we let $\pi:R \longrightarrow R/I$ be the canonical quotient map, then your map $\phi$ can be expressed as $\phi(a_0 + a_1 x + \cdots + a_n x^n) = \pi(a_0) + \pi(a_1)x + \cdots \pi(a_n)x^n$. As you point out, $\phi$ is a surjective ring homomorphism. By the First Isomorphism Theorem, we're done if we can show that the kernel of $\phi$ is $I[x]$.

Suppose that $\phi$ maps $a_0 + a_1x + \cdots + a_nx^n$ to zero. Recall that a polynomial is zero if and only if each of its coefficients is zero. This means that $\pi(a_i) = 0$ for each $i$. By the definition of $\pi$, this implies that $a_i \in I$ for each $i$, and we conclude that our polynomial is in $I[x]$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If we replace $a_i+I$ in the OP's solution by $\pi(a_i)$ I think we get your solution. So, it's not clear what "isn't quite right" in the OP's solution. $\endgroup$ – user26857 Sep 3 '16 at 21:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @user26857 I stand corrected. I mistook the OP's equation $\phi(a_0 + a_1x + \cdots + a_nx^n) = I$ to be a notational mistake, but of course, it isn't. The ideal $I$ is the zero element of $(R/I)[X]$. I write this as $0 + I$, to emphasize that I'm thinking of a coset (i.e., an element of $R/I$) and not merely an ideal (i.e., a subset $I \subset R$.) But that's a matter of preference alone. $\endgroup$ – PeterJL Sep 12 '16 at 7:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.