1
$\begingroup$

I have the following problem:

Let $\Omega$ be a finite or countable set, $\mathfrak{F}$ a $\sigma$-algebra and $\mathbb{P}$ a probability measure. Prove there doesn't exist a collection $(A_i)_{i\in\mathbb{N}}$ of independents events in $(\Omega, \mathfrak{F},\mathbb{P})$, with $\mathbb{P}(A_i)=1/2$ for all $i\in \mathbb{N}.$

First I suppose that the collection exists and then I conclude $$\mathbb{P}\left(\bigcap_{n\geq1}A_i\right)=0$$ and

$$\mathbb{P}\left(\bigcup_{n\geq1}A_i\right)=1,$$ but then I don't know how to continue. Also I don't know if this is useful.

Can someone give me an idea or help?

Thanks in advance :)

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Try proving it first under the assumption that $\mathcal{F} = 2^\Omega$. Use countable additivity to show that there exists a singleton $\omega$ with $P(\{\omega\}) > 0$. Also note that for any $n$, you can use $A_1, A_2, \dots, A_n$ to partition $\Omega$ into $2^n$ sets, each with probability $1/2^n$. Take $n$ sufficiently large to get a contradiction.

More generally, you can prove that a countable $\Omega$ must contain an atom: a measurable set $B \in \mathcal{F}$ with $P(B) > 0$ and such that $B$ contains no proper nonempty measurable subset. Then you can get a contradiction just as before.

As yet another approach, set $X = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{2^n} 1_{A_n}$. Prove that for any real number $x$ we have $P(X=x) = 0$. But since $\Omega$ is countable, the range of $X$ is a countable set $\{x_1, x_2, \dots\}$. Then $\Omega = \bigcup_n \{X = x_n\}$, meaning $P(\Omega) \le \sum_n P(X = x_n) = 0$ which is absurd.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.