While attempting to solve the question Alternating harmonic sum $\sum_{k\geq 1}\frac{(-1)^k}{k^3}H_k$ we have discovered a following puzzling identity: \begin{equation} Li_q(-1) = \left(2^{1-q} - 1\right) \zeta(q)=\frac{(-1)^{q-1}}{(q-1)! 2^q} \left( \Psi^{(q-1)}(\frac{1}{2}) - \Psi^{(q-1)}(1)\right) \end{equation} for $q=2,3,4,\cdots$. As far as I know no closed form expressions are known for zeta function values at odd integers. The relationship above does give some closed form expression. Now, the question would be is this relationship something trivial or are there any generalizations of that?

Note: Using the series representation of the polygamma function the above relation simply reduces to: \begin{equation} \Psi^{(q-1)} \left(\frac{1}{2}\right) = \left(2^q-1\right) \Psi^{(q-1)}\left(1\right) =\left(2^q-1\right) (-1)^q (q-1)! \zeta(q) \end{equation} Is this a trivial identity or not ?

  • $\begingroup$ Depends on the interpretation of trivial, e.q. simply insert dlmf.nist.gov/5.15.E2 into dlmf.nist.gov/5.15.E3 $\endgroup$ – gammatester Aug 31 '16 at 12:06
  • $\begingroup$ Concerning your first question: Why would you consider $\Psi^{(q-1)}(\frac{1}{2})$ a closed form but not $\zeta(q)?$ $\endgroup$ – gammatester Aug 31 '16 at 13:19
  • $\begingroup$ @gammatester: The first question was asked very hastily without thinking through. I take it back. The above simply relates all derivatives of the Gamma function at one half to to values of zeta function at integers. If we had an independent way to compute the former that certainly this would pave the way to finding zeta function values at odd integers. By the way do you know if there is any progress in solving this very problem? $\endgroup$ – Przemo Aug 31 '16 at 13:27
  • $\begingroup$ Unfortunately I do not know about any progress. $\endgroup$ – gammatester Aug 31 '16 at 14:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.