Is there a cover of the disk in the plane by three open connected sets $U_1, U_2, U_3$ such that any two of these sets have nonempty intersection, but the triple intersection $U_1 ∩ U_2 ∩ U_3$ is empty?

Clearly this is possible for the disk's boundary, i.e. a circle, but it does not seem possible for the disk itself. I can tell that such a cover will not be a good cover, since this would imply the disk is homotopically equivalent to the covering's nerve, in this case a triangle.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Do you mean three open sets in the plane (in which case @Janik's answer works) or three relatively-open sets in the disk (which seems more likely)? $\endgroup$ – John Hughes Aug 25 '16 at 21:29
  • $\begingroup$ I suppose I should merely have said "the disk" with no mention to the plane. I only care about the topology of the disk; its coincidental embedding in the plane is unimportant here. $\endgroup$ – Feryll Aug 26 '16 at 1:52
  • $\begingroup$ Ah,..in that case @Janik's answer is no longer useful. But it was clever! My guess is that the answer is "no, there's no such thing", in part because you've required that the $U_i$ be connected. If you said "path connected," I think that it might be not too hard to make a fundamental-group argument why it's impossible, but I can't do so off the top of my head. $\endgroup$ – John Hughes Aug 26 '16 at 1:59
  • $\begingroup$ Path components in a (weakly) locally connected space are open anyway, so connected implies path connected in this case. $\endgroup$ – Feryll Aug 26 '16 at 3:23

No it is not true. Mayer-Vietoris sequence for homology will give a contradiction.

Suppose $D^2 = U\cup V\cup W$ where $U,V,W$ are connected open set. Let $Z=V\cup W$ is connected open set . Then the fact that these three open sets have no common point implies $Z\cap U$ has at least two open component ( since $U\cap V$ and $U\cap W$ are non-empty). Now Mayer-Vietories long exact sequence for the pair $(U,Z)$

$\cdots \to H_1(D^2)\to H_0(U\cap Z)\to H_o(U)\oplus H_0(Z)\to H_0(D^2)\to 0$


$\cdots \to 0\to H_0(U\cap Z) \to \mathbb{Z\oplus Z} \to \mathbb{Z}\to 0$

Since the above s.e.s splits, this implies $H_o(U\cap Z)= \mathbb Z$ which is a contradiction.

EDIT: Actually the above solution tells us that not only for $D^2$ but for any simply connected space, we cannot cover it by using $3$ open connected sets which satisfy the given property.

  • $\begingroup$ Forgive my ignorance but why does the s.e.s. at the end split? $\endgroup$ – Pete Caradonna Aug 26 '16 at 14:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @PeteCaradonna Do you know projective module en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projective_module ? You read the following link, and if you have any doubts, you can ask, I;ll try to answer you. $\endgroup$ – Anubhav Mukherjee Aug 26 '16 at 15:35
  • $\begingroup$ I haven't encountered them before, no. Sorry for what I suspect is a trivial question but how do they get relate to this? $\endgroup$ – Pete Caradonna Aug 26 '16 at 15:39
  • $\begingroup$ @PeteCaradonna Any free module is a projective module, and for any projective module, the s.e.s splits. $\endgroup$ – Anubhav Mukherjee Aug 26 '16 at 15:41
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, ok, I was overthinking it. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – Pete Caradonna Aug 26 '16 at 15:42

So I'm no expert on this, but here's a thought that might work.

Let $U_{ij} := U_i\cap U_j$.

Let $V_i$ denote the trivial line bundle on $U_i$. We may glue $V_1$ to $V_2$ via some isomorphism $\alpha_{12} : V_1|_{U_{12}}\rightarrow V_2|_{U_{12}}$, and similarly we may glue $V_2$ to $V_3$ via an isomorphism $\alpha_{23} : V_2|_{U_{23}}\rightarrow V_3|_{U_{23}}$.

Let $s_1$ be a section of $V_1$.

Since the $V_i$'s are trivial, $\alpha_{12}$ is determined by where it sends the section $s_1|_{U_{12}}\in V_1|_{U_{12}}$. Let $s_2|_{U_{12}} := \alpha_{12}(s_1|_{U_{12}})$, and let $s_2$ be the extension of $s_2|_{U_{12}}$ to all of $V_2$ (makes sense since $V_2$ is trivial). Similarly, let $s_3 := $"$\alpha_{23}(s_2)$". Finally, glue $V_1$ to $V_3$ via an isomorphism $\alpha_{13} : V_1|_{U_{13}}\rightarrow V_3|_{U_{13}}$ which does not send $s_1\mapsto s_3$.

If $U_1\cap U_2\cap U_3 = \emptyset$, then the cocycle condition is automatically satisfied, and these gluings (ie, "transition functions") should combine to yield a line bundle on the disc which is NOT trivial, since the local section $s_1$ can't extend to a global section (since $\alpha_{13}(s_1)\ne s_3$). On the other hand, there are no nontrivial line bundles on the disc, contradicting the assumption that $U_1\cap U_2\cap U_3 = \emptyset$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.