0
$\begingroup$

After solving a physics problem, this was the equation I came to:

$$ \left\{ \begin{array}{c} m_2\ddot x_2+k(x_2-x_1-l)=0 \\ m_1\ddot x_1 + m_2 \ddot x_2=0 \end{array} \right. $$

Where $m_1$ and $m_2$, the masses; $k$, the spring coefficient; and $l$, spring length are constants.

$x_1$ and $x_2$ are our variables.

If the two masses were identical, it could be easily transformed into the SHM equation and be solved using the substitution $u=x_2-x_1-l$.

But now, when I try to substitute, the equation will still contain other-than-u variables. That makes it impossible for me to solve.

Can anyone help me?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Look up reduced mass. You'll need the substitutions $\frac{1}{\mu}=\frac{1}{m_1}+\frac{1}{m_2}$ and $x=x_1-x_2$. Note the second substitution can be differentiated. $\endgroup$ – Mark Aug 17 '16 at 8:18
1
$\begingroup$

$$ \left\{ \begin{array}{c} m_2 x''_2+k(x_2-x_1-l)=0 \\ m_1 x''_1 + m_2 x''_2=0 \end{array} \right. $$

$x_1=\frac{m_2}{k}x''_2+x_2-l$

$x''_1=\frac{m_2}{k}x''''_2+x''_2 = -\frac{m_2}{m_1}x''_2$

$$m_1m_2x''''_2+k(m_1+m_2)x''_2 =0$$ This is a fourth order linear ODE. It can easily be reduced to second order and then be solved, leading to $x_2(t)$ .

Putting this result into $\quad x_1=\frac{m_2}{k}x''_2+x_2-l\quad $ gives $x_1(t)$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.