1
$\begingroup$

I wanted to find pair of (integers) numbers (actually just 3 of them) such that:

$$9U=9K_1 + 4 K_1^2$$

I've tried choosing a fixed integer starting at 1 for U and then had mathematica/wolfram find $K_1$. So far I've tried up to 6 with no luck. However, I wasn't sure if this even had a solution and my knowledge in number theory is quite limited. So I thought it would be wise to ask the expert community on this.


Just in case this is impossible to solve, I'd be sort of ok with numbers such that $U,K_1$ are at least $ \epsilon < 0.5$ close to an integer. This is not the ideal case but if its impossible I accept approximations or I need to change my conditions to make this problem solvable.

If you are curious this equation came from trying to find integers that satisfy:

$$ 9U = 3K_1 + 2 K_1 K_2 + 3 K_2 $$

for some nice properties of my problem choosing $4K_1 = 2K_2 \iff 2K_1 = K_2$. Though I guess we could change that condition if necessary but it wouldn't be ideal.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ clearly there is exactly one $U$ for every $K_1$ that is a multiple of $3$ $\endgroup$ – Jorge Fernández Hidalgo Aug 14 '16 at 17:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Pinocchio - from your equation, $4K_1^2$ is divisible by $9$, right? Then, this means that $K_1^2$ itself must be divisible by $9$. (If you ask WHY, then you are in over your head - you should go back to basics). Then $K_1$ must be divisible by $3$. Put $K_1 = 3a$. That gives you Carry's solution. $\endgroup$ – mathguy Aug 14 '16 at 18:10
3
$\begingroup$

The solution set is $\{K_1=3a, U=3a+4a^2 \mid a\in \mathbb Z\}$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ some more details for those dummys like me would be nice. Thanks for the help (can't accept yet). $\endgroup$ – Pinocchio Aug 14 '16 at 17:46
  • $\begingroup$ @Carry on Smiling . You have a "typo". U needs to be 1/9 of what you wrote. $\endgroup$ – Mark L. Stone Aug 14 '16 at 17:58
  • $\begingroup$ The edit by @mathguy is wrong. $\endgroup$ – Mark L. Stone Aug 14 '16 at 18:26
  • $\begingroup$ @MarkL.Stone should be ok now, thanks for that. $\endgroup$ – Jorge Fernández Hidalgo Aug 14 '16 at 18:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.