Let $(x_i,y_i) \in \mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}\times \mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}$ for $i=1,2,3$ be three distinct points, then if these points do not satisfy a linear equation like $$ax+by = c$$ for $(a,b)\in \mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}\times \mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z} \setminus \{(0,0)\}$ and $c \in \mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}$ then they satisfy a quadratic equation like: $$(x-a)^2 + (y-b)^2= c$$ where $a,b \in \mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}$ and $c \in \mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z} \setminus \{0\}$


When expanding the quadratic equation above one gets ($\tilde c = a^2+b^2-c)$:

$$\begin{cases} x_1 a+y_1 b + \tilde c = -x_1^2-y_1^2\\ x_2 a+ y_2 b + \tilde c = -x_2^2-y_2^2\\ x_3 a+ y_3 b + \tilde c = -x_3^2 -y_3^2 \end{cases}$$

When the deteriminant of the above would be 0, then $(x_i,y_i), i=1,2,3$ would satisfy

$$(y_2-y_3)x+(x_3-x_2)y = x_3y_2-x_2y_3$$ which contradicts the claim that it does not satisfy any linear equation of this form.

This means the determinant is non-zero and then it leads to a unique solution $a,b,\tilde c$.


Can someone clarify how one derives: $$(y_2-y_3)x+(x_3-x_2)y = x_3y_2-x_2y_3$$

I guess the claim is actually: the rank of the system of equations is 3 which would result in a unique solution (for $a,b,\tilde c$). Let the rank be less than 3 then

$$\begin{vmatrix} x_1 & y_1 & -x_1^2-y_1^2 \\ x_2 & y_2 & -x_2^2-y_2^2\\ x_3 & y_3 & -x_3^2-y_3^2 \end{vmatrix} = 0$$

And then I should be able to derive the equation from this determinant, but I haven't been able to do so.

I've also tried a (eq 2) $-$ (eq 3), but that didn't really resulted in anything useful.

  • $\begingroup$ I think there are some typos at the RHS of your system of equations. $\endgroup$ – paf Aug 13 '16 at 20:10
  • $\begingroup$ Moreover, you may note that if $x\in\Bbb Z/3\Bbb Z$, then $x=0$ or $x^2=1$. $\endgroup$ – paf Aug 13 '16 at 20:13
  • $\begingroup$ Woops fixed the typo's, thnx. How can $x^2=0 \vee x^2 = 1$ be used? $\endgroup$ – dietervdf Aug 13 '16 at 20:15
  • $\begingroup$ @paf As Batominowski's answer shows, this result is valid in all fields with characteristic not equal to $2$, so one shouldn't need to use that. @${}$dietervdf A readability tip - unless you're working in the context of symbolic logic, you should avoid using the vee symbol $\vee$ to mean 'or'. Use the word 'or' instead. $\endgroup$ – John Gowers Aug 13 '16 at 22:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Batominovski The second one is actually a fake non-working reference. There's some empty MathJax - ${}$ - between the @ sign and the name. $\endgroup$ – John Gowers Aug 13 '16 at 22:35

Geometric Solution

Replace $3$ by $p$, where $p=0$ or $p$ is an odd prime natural number, and $\mathbb{F}_3=\mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z}$ by any field $\mathbb{K}$ of characteristic $p$. The affine space $\mathbb{K}\mathbb{A}^2$ is equipped with the standard inner product $\langle\_,\_\rangle$: $$\big\langle\left(u_1,v_1\right),\left(u_2,v_2\right)\big\rangle=u_1u_2+v_1v_2$$ for all $u_1,u_2,v_1,v_2\in \mathbb{K}$.

Let $A_i:=\left(x_i,y_i\right)$ for $i=1,2,3$. The (signed) area of the triangle $A_1A_2A_3$ is $$\Delta:=\frac{x_2y_3-x_3y_2+x_3y_1-x_1y_3+x_1y_2-x_2y_1}{2}\,.$$ If the $A_i$'s are collinear, which happens when $$\Delta=0\,,$$ then we are done. In fact, the three points satisfy a single linear equation $$\left(y_2-y_1\right)\,\left(x-x_1\right)-\left(x_2-x_1\right)\,\left(y-y_1\right)=0\,.$$

If $\Delta\neq 0$, then we can find perpendicular bisectors (with respect to $\langle\_,\_\rangle$) of $A_2A_3$, $A_3A_1$, and $A_1A_2$ (noting that bisection is possible as the field has characteristic not equal to $2$). These perpendicular bisectors must concurrent at a point $O=(a,b)$. It follows easily that there exists $c\in\mathbb{K}$ with $$\left(x_i-a\right)^2+\left(y_i-b\right)^2=c$$ for every $i=1,2,3$. Indeed, $$a=\frac{\left(y_2-y_3\right)\left(y_3-y_1\right)\left(y_1-y_2\right)-x_1^2\left(y_2-y_3\right)-x_2^2\left(y_3-y_1\right)-x_3^2\left(y_1-y_2\right)}{4\Delta}$$ and $$b=\frac{\left(x_2-x_3\right)\left(x_3-x_1\right)\left(x_1-x_2\right)-y_1^2\left(x_2-x_3\right)-y_2^2\left(x_3-x_1\right)-y_3^2\left(x_1-x_2\right)}{4\Delta}\,,$$ which gives $$c=\frac{\left(\left(x_2-x_3\right)^2+\left(y_2-y_3\right)^2\right)\left(\left(x_3-x_1\right)^2+\left(y_3-y_1\right)^2\right)\left(\left(x_1-x_2\right)^2+\left(y_1-y_2\right)^2\right)}{16\,\Delta^2}\,.$$

Note that, if the roots of $z^2+1=0$ are not in $\mathbb{K}$, then $c\neq 0$. In particular, when $p=3$ and $\mathbb{K}=\mathbb{F}_3$, we always have $c\neq 0$. Otherwise, $c$ can be $0$. An example is when $p=5$, $\mathbb{K}=\mathbb{F}_5$, $\left(x_1,y_1\right)=0$, $\left(x_2,y_2\right)=(1,2)$, and $\left(x_3,y_3\right)=(2,1)$, where $\Delta=1$, $a=0$, $b=0$, and $c=0$ (this is one weird circle---it passes through its center and is essentially the union of two lines intersecting at the center).

I haven't thought about this question when the characteristic of $\mathbb{K}$ is $2$. There is probably a counterexample (i.e., there may exist three non-collinear points which are not cyclic).

P.S.: The midpoint of $(u,v)$ and $(u',v')$ is given by $\left(\frac{u+u'}{2},\frac{v+v'}{2}\right)$. Hence, the perpendicular bisector of the segment connecting $(u,v)$ and $\left(u',v'\right)$ is given by the equation $$\left(u-u'\right)\,\left(x-\frac{u+u'}{2}\right)+\left(v-v'\right)\left(y-\frac{v+v'}{2}\right)=0\,.$$


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.