5
$\begingroup$

I know this question has been asked to death, but I wish to prove that $\mathbb{Q}$ is not locally compact with a use of a lemma I have not seen used in the other proofs.

Lem:

Given $(X, \mathfrak{T})$ Hausdorff, then it is locally compact iff every point is contained in an open set with compact closure

My attempt:

Since $\mathbb{Q}$ is a subspace of $\mathbb{R}$, therefore $\mathbb{Q}$ is Hausdorff given that Hausdorffness is arbitrarily hereditary.

To show that $\mathbb{Q}$ is not locally compact, we wish to produce a point $x \in \mathbb{Q}$ that is contained in an open set without a compact closure.

Let $U = (a,b) \subset \mathbb{R}$. Then $U \cap \mathbb{Q}$ is an open set in the subspace topology. Pick $x \in U \cap \mathbb{Q}$, then $x \in U \cap \mathbb{Q} \subseteq \overline {U \cap \mathbb{Q}}$. (Alarm bells: $\overline {A \cap B}$ might not be equal to $\overline A \cap \overline B$)

Now we need to show that $ \overline {U \cap \mathbb{Q}}$ is not compact...however intuitively this set feels like $[a,b] \subset \mathbb{R}$...

What!

Does anyone see how to resolve this? Thanks so much

Also there is another answer using a much simpler characterization Why Q is not locally compact, connected, or path connected? Can we see that the lemma I am using and the one given https://math.stackexchange.com/a/650270/174904 is equivalent?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ All compact sets in $\mathbb Q$ have empty interior. $\endgroup$ – user42761 Aug 9 '16 at 9:37
6
$\begingroup$

You need to find a point so that none of its open neighborhoods has compact closure.

Let's consider $0$. Suppose $U$ is an open neighborhood of $0$ (in $\mathbb{Q}$) that has compact closure. Then $U\supseteq(-1/n,1/n)\cap\mathbb{Q}$, for some integer $n>0$. Therefore the closure of $(-1/n,1/n)\cap\mathbb{Q}$ (in $\mathbb{Q}$) is compact as well.

Let $C$ be the closure (in $\mathbb{Q}$) of $(-1/n,1/n)\cap\mathbb{Q}$. Take your favorite irrational number $r\in(0,1/n)$ and an increasing sequence $(r_n)$ in $(0,1/n)\cap\mathbb{Q}$ that converges to $r$. Then $(r_n)$ is a sequence in $C$, but no subsequence is convergent (in $\mathbb{Q}$), a contradiction.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.