Let $C$ be a non-singular projective curve of genus $g\geq2$ over $\mathbb{C}$.

If $g\geq 3$ and $C$ is general, why does $C$ not admit etale coverings $\pi:C\rightarrow C'$ of degree $>1$? Is this due to the fact, that a general curve of genus $g\geq 3$ does not have automorphisms?

If $g=2$, why does no curve $C$ of this genus admit etale coverings $C\rightarrow C'$? (I think I figured this one out: this follows from the Riemann-Hurwitz formula.)

  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand your claim. Just pick a finite unramified field extension of the function field and then the normalization. $\endgroup$ – user40276 Aug 4 '16 at 10:23
  • $\begingroup$ I forgot that the curve should be projective. See for example See for example arxiv.org/abs/math/9902145 . It is stated in Corollary 2.6. $\endgroup$ – Bernie Aug 4 '16 at 11:23
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @user40276: the OP wants the given curve $C$ to be the source of the etale map. Your construction would give a covering with $C$ as the target. $\endgroup$ – Nefertiti Aug 4 '16 at 12:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If $g=2$, then you're right that $C\to C'$ finite etale forces $C\to C'$ to be an isomorphism. This is simply because $2= 2g-2 = d(2g'-2)$. This clearly can only hold if $d=1$ and $g'=2$ (otherwise $d(2g'-2) >2$). Now, you just need to use that finite \'etale of degree one is an isomorphism. $\endgroup$ – Ariyan Javanpeykar Aug 4 '16 at 15:55
  • $\begingroup$ @Nefertiti Oh! I see, now. I haven't noticed the ${}^'$ in the $C'$. Thanks for pointing it. $\endgroup$ – user40276 Aug 5 '16 at 0:36

To answer the question about $C \to C'$, there are probably various ways to this, probably including easier ones than those I am going to suggest.

If you fix a genus $g',$ and consider etale covers of some fixed degree $d$ of $C'$, you get curves $C$ of some prescribed genus $g$ (given by the Riemann--Hurwitz formula). Now $C'$ depends on $3g' - 3$ parameters (this is the dimension of the moduli space of genus $g'$ curves), and it has only finitely many etale covers of fixed degree. So the curves $C$ which admits etale morphisms $C \to C'$ depend only on $3g'-3$ parameters. But the moduli space of genus $g$ curves is of dimension $3g -3$, so most curves do not arise as such etale covers.

Another way to think about the problem (but I don't know how to actually prove it this way) is that if we have an etale cover $C \to C'$ then we obtain a morphism of Jacobians $\mathrm{Jac}(C') \to \mathrm{Jac}(C)$, and so $\mathrm{Jac}(C)$ is not a simple abelian variety. But, heuristically, there is no reason to expect that for a general curve $C$, its Jacobian wouldn't be simple. (One problem with this approach is that most abelian varieties don't arise as Jacobians at all, and so, while I find it suggestive, it isn't more than that, as it stands.)


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.