This question is based on two answers I saw. I want to know if my reasoning is correct in each case. For me, $A$ is always a commutative ring with $1 \ne 0$.

In the first answer this proposition was given:

Let $f_1,\dots,f_t\in A[X]$ be nonzero. If there is $0 \ne g\in A[X]$ such that $gf_1=\cdots=gf_t=0$, then there is $0 \ne a\in A$ such that $af_1=\cdots=af_t=0$.

Assuming the case $t = 1$ which is McCoy's theorem, I think I can prove this as follows:

Proof: Let $\displaystyle F := \sum_{i=1}^t f_i X^{\sum_{j < i} (1 + \deg f_j)}$. Then $gf_1 = \ldots = gf_t = 0 \implies gF = 0 \implies aF = 0$ for some $0 \ne a \in A \implies af_1 = \ldots = af_t = 0$. The last implication is because every coefficient of each $f_i$ appears exactly once as a coefficient of $F$.$\newcommand{\N}{\mathbb{N}}$

Question 1: Is the proof above correct?

Moving on to the next question, in the other answer this proposition was given:

(*) Let $A$ be a commutative $\N$-graded ring. Let $f \in A$ be a zerodivisor. Then there is some $0 \ne a \in A$ homogeneous such that $af = 0$.

I think the proof given in that answer has a fatal flaw, which was pointed out as a comment but with no response. Specifically $\deg f_ig < \deg g$ may not be true. For polynomial rings in $1$ variable it's ok because $f_i = a_ix^i$ where $a_i$ has degree $0$ and $x^i$ is a nonzerodivisor, so $\deg a_ig < \deg g$ and $a_ig \ne 0$. So my second question is:

Question 2: Is (*) true? If not, what is a counterexample?

One note is that (*) is true if $A$ is Noetherian (since then every zerodivisor is in some associated prime, which is the annihilator of a homogeneous element). So a counterexample would have to be non-Noetherian.

  • $\begingroup$ 1) looks right; I don't know about 2) $\endgroup$ – 57Jimmy Jul 31 '16 at 20:53

Question 1: Your proof is correct (or at least it is as far as I can tell).

Question 2: The general case follows from the Noetherian case. Indeed, suppose $f\in A$ is a zerodivisor, with $gf=0$ for some nonzero $g$. Let $B$ be the subring of $A$ generated by the homogeneous parts of $f$ and $g$. Then $B$ is a finitely generated ring, and hence is Noetherian. Since $B$ is generated by homogeneous elements, it is a graded subring of $A$. By the Noetherian case, there exists some homogeneous $0\neq a\in B\subseteq A$ such that $af=0$.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the answer! I think the proof for 2) should be fine. The only things left to check are that $B$ is $\mathbb{N}$-graded, and being homogeneous in $B$ implies being homogeneous in $A$. Could you say a bit on why these are true? $\endgroup$ – Jay Jul 31 '16 at 21:09
  • $\begingroup$ $B$ is just the subring of $A$ generated by a bunch of homogeneous elements, so it can inherit $A$'s grading. Explicitly, the $n$th graded piece of $B$ is just the abelian group generated by those products of the generators of $B$ which have degree $n$. $\endgroup$ – Eric Wofsey Jul 31 '16 at 21:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.