• $d\in\mathbb N$
  • $\lambda$ denote the Lebesgue measure on $\mathbb R^d$
  • $\Omega\subseteq\mathbb R^d$ be open
  • $H:=L^2(\Omega,\mathbb R^d)$
  • $U$ be a separable $\mathbb R$-Hilbert space
  • $Q:U\to H$ be a Hilbert-Schmidt Operator

It's easy to see that for $\lambda$-almost all $x\in\Omega$ $$\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)\;\;\;\text{for }u\in U$$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt Operator from $U$ to $\mathbb R^d$, since $$\int_\Omega\left\|\tilde Q(x)\right\|_{\operatorname{HS}(U,\:\mathbb R^d)}^2\;{\rm d}\lambda(x)=\left\|Q\right\|_{\operatorname{HS}(U,\:H)}^2<\infty\;.\tag 1$$

How can we determine the adjoint ${\tilde Q(x)}^\ast$ of $\tilde Q(x)$? In particular, how can we calculate $\tilde Q(x){\tilde Q(x)}^\ast e_i$ for the $i$th standard basis vector $e_i$ of $\mathbb R^d$?

  • $\begingroup$ it means nothing to me. make things simple, nobody cares $Q$ is HS, it won't change anything that it is compact $\endgroup$ – reuns Jul 28 '16 at 14:21
  • $\begingroup$ @user1952009 The question is short. How can I further simplify it? Maybe it helps you, if you know my motivation: I've hoped that the special form of $\tilde Q$ would help me in my other question. $\endgroup$ – 0xbadf00d Jul 28 '16 at 14:24
  • $\begingroup$ what is $(Qu)(x)$ and $\tilde{Q}(x)u$ ? you know that $h \mapsto h(x)$ isn't a bounded operator ? but if you replace $x$ by ... then $h \mapsto h(x)$ becomes bounded and $\tilde{Q}$ is simply $Q^*$ $\endgroup$ – reuns Jul 28 '16 at 14:26
  • $\begingroup$ so no I don't want to help you if you make no efforts : make your questions clear $\endgroup$ – reuns Jul 28 '16 at 14:27
  • $\begingroup$ @user1952009 $Q$ is a given HS-operator from $U$ to $H=L^2(\Omega,\mathbb R^d)$ and hence $Qu$ is a function in $H$. $\endgroup$ – 0xbadf00d Jul 28 '16 at 14:38

Just curious... Your eq (2) seems to be \begin{align*} \left\langle u,\widetilde{Q}\left(x\right)^{*}y\right\rangle _{U} & =\left\langle \widetilde{Q}\left(x\right)u,y\right\rangle _{\mathbb{R}^{d}}, \end{align*} for $x,y\in\mathbb{R}^{d}$, and $u\in U$.

Fix $x,y\in\mathbb{R}^{d}$, and choose an ONB $\left\{ \varphi_{j}\right\} $ in $U$. (I'm going to assume $\left\langle \cdot,\cdot\right\rangle $ is linear in the second variable.) Then \begin{align*} \widetilde{Q}\left(x\right)^{*}y & =\sum_{j}\left\langle \varphi_{j},\widetilde{Q}\left(x\right)^{*}y\right\rangle _{U}\varphi_{j}=\sum_{j}\left\langle \widetilde{Q}\left(x\right)\varphi_{j},y\right\rangle _{\mathbb{R}^{d}}\varphi_{j}. \end{align*} So this gives \begin{align*} \widetilde{Q}\left(x\right)^{*} & =\sum_{j}\left|\varphi_{j}\left\rangle \right\langle \widetilde{Q}\left(x\right)\varphi_{j}\right|=\sum_{j}\left|\varphi_{j}\left\rangle \right\langle \left(Q\varphi_{j}\right)\left(x\right)\right|. \end{align*}

  • $\begingroup$ Clearly, there was a typo in $(2)$ and the equation should be as you wrote. $\endgroup$ – 0xbadf00d Jul 31 '16 at 9:54
  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand the notation in your last equation. $\endgroup$ – 0xbadf00d Jul 31 '16 at 10:06
  • $\begingroup$ The last line is a notation for rank-1 operators. So $\left|\varphi_{j}\left\rangle \right\langle \left(Q\varphi_{j}\right)\left(x\right)\right|:\mathbb{R}^{d}\longrightarrow U$, by \begin{align*} \mathbb{R}^{d} & \in y\longmapsto\left\langle \left(Q\varphi_{j}\right)\left(x\right),y\right\rangle \varphi_{j}\in U. \end{align*} $\endgroup$ – James Jul 31 '16 at 10:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.