8
$\begingroup$

On evaluating quadratic equations, It always equals zero:

$$ax^2+bx+c=0$$

Why zero? Is it possible to use other number for another purpose?

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Yes, and then you can just subtract the number from both sides..... $\endgroup$ – user5137 Aug 25 '12 at 21:00
  • 11
    $\begingroup$ If you use another number, say $d$, instead of $0$, then you can as well study $ax^2 + bx + e = 0$ with $e=c-d$. So this covers every possible case of interest. $\endgroup$ – user20266 Aug 25 '12 at 21:00
  • $\begingroup$ if you want to equate it to another polynomial expression, you can move the right hand side over to the left and you get another expression that gives $P(x)=0$ for a polynomial $P$. This includes cases where you let the right hand side be a constant (which, after moving over, makes another $P(x)=0$ with $P$ being a quadratic expression.) $\endgroup$ – finnlim Aug 25 '12 at 21:02
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It's a normal form that we like to study: LHS = 0. In fact, it's trivial to show that we can always take any equation of the form LHS = RHS, and re-write it into that normal form. $\endgroup$ – user2468 Aug 25 '12 at 21:16
  • 14
    $\begingroup$ Back in the bad old days when there were no negative numbers outside China and India, Al-Khwarizmi had many types of quadratic equations: $x^2=5x+6$, $x^2+5x=6$, $x^2+6=7x$ were of different types, and required different analyses. But with negative numbers allowed as coefficients, we can make the right-hand side equal to $0$ in all cases, so there is only one type. $\endgroup$ – André Nicolas Aug 25 '12 at 21:28
17
$\begingroup$

The value of c is a simple number with no variable. So you can move any value on the right side over to the left and it will just become part of c. Example: $$x^2+x-6=6$$ $$x^2+x-12=0$$

Therefore, we can set the right hand side equal to any number we want. We usually set it equal to zero because this helps to solve later. Example: $$(x+3)(x-2) = 6$$ vs $$(x-3)(x+4) = 0$$

The second one is easier to solve because we know anything multiplied by 0 is 0. That means we can solve each part individually.

EDIT: After we reach the factored form, we know the answer is in the form of something multiplied by something else equals a number. If that number is not 0 then we must take both parts into account. On the other hand, if it is 0 then we can simply ask what will make one of those parts zero? Then it doesn't matter what the other part is.
$$(x-3)(x+4) = 0$$ Here, we know that if $(x-3) = 0$ or $(x+4) = 0$ then the whole thing will equal zero, because anything multiplied by 0 is 0. So, we can just ask what value of $x$ will make $(x-3) = 0$ true?

Compare this to the version not set to zero: $$(x+3)(x-2) = 6$$ Now, we can't make this any simpler. We must figure out what value of $x$ will make that entire thing true from the start.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The second one is easier to solve because we know anything multiplied by 0 is 0. I didn't get it, when will we need to multiply by 0? $\endgroup$ – Billy Rubina Aug 26 '12 at 11:38
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @GustavoBandeira: You have a product of two factors, $(x-3)$ and $(x+4)$, which is $0$. A product of two factors is $0$ iff at least one of the factors is $0$. Thus we know that either $x-3=0$ or $x+4=0$, thus we see immediately that the solutions are $3$ and $-4$. On the other hand, there's no general rule of this sort if the product is $6$ (or any other non-zero number). $\endgroup$ – celtschk Aug 26 '12 at 20:31
7
$\begingroup$

Absolutely! But think about what you end up with. Consider the quadratic equation

$x^2 + 2x + 3 = 2 \, . $

If we now subtract 2 from both sides we get $x^2 + 2x + 1 = 0.$ Meaning that these two equations are just two ways of expressing the same thing. So, to save you the trouble of substracting 2 from both sides, you'll be presented with $x^2 + 2x + 1 = 0$ instead of $x^2 + 2x + 3 = 2.$

In fact, you don't even need a number on the right hand side. What about

$2x^2 + 5x - 9 = x^2 + 3x - 10 \, ? $

I could subtract $x^2 + 3x - 10$ from both sides and end up with our friend $x^2 + 2x + 1= 0$. Any equation of the form $px^2 + qx + r = sx^2 + tx + u$ can be simplified - tidied up, if you will - into the form $ax^2 + bx + c = 0.$ When you come across one in the form $ax^2 + bx + c = 0$ it simply means someone has tidied it all up for you in advance. (And it doesn't change the solutions!)

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

DaleSwanson's answer is nice. I just include this as an answer because its too long for a comment:

Consider this, if $a_1,a_2 \neq 0$ then $y=a_1x^2+b_1x+c_1$ and $y=a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2$ give parabolas in the $xy$-plane for particular choices of $b_1,b_2,c_1,c_2$. These parabolas intersect if the equation $a_1x^2+b_1x+c_1 = a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2$ has a solution. Bringing all the terms to the r.h.s yields $(a_2-a_1)x^2+(b_2-b_1)x+c_2-c_1=0$. Let $a=a_2-a_1$, $b=b_2-b_1$ and $c=c_2-c_1$ and we obtain the standard $ax^2+bx+c=0$. Assuming $a \neq 0$ amounts to supposing $a_2 \neq a_1$ and the existence of solutions now characterizes the locations (if any) where the parabolas $y=a_1x^2+b_1x+c_1$ and $y=a_2x^2+b_2x+c_2$ intersect.

More generally, suppose $y=f(x)$ and $y=g(x)$ are graphs of polynomials with $deg(f)=m$ and $deg(g)=n$. $m<n$, therefore, the number of possible intersections will be at most $n$.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

$$ax^2+bx+c=0 \implies ax^2+bx=-c$$

$$ax^2+bx+c-d=0 \implies ax^2+bx+c=d$$

We generally want the quadratic to equal zero, however, because the solutions are the roots of the quadratic. Roots of functions, i.e. the solutions(s) of functions the form $f(x)=0$ are very important.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

it is general form ,namely second order polynomial equation and express like $f(x)=0$ where $f(x)=a*x^2+b*x+c$ what if this is equal to some number $D$? $a*x^2+b*x+c=D$ so we can write it as $a*x^2+b*x+c-D=0$

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

I FINALLY UNDERSTAND WHY THE QUADRATIC EQUATION IS SET TO ZERO!!!!

You "solve" a quadratic equation by figuring out "WHEN Y=0 what does X equal?"(x,0). That's why you set the equation to 0 and not any other number; to find the X-intercept(s) aka (x, 0) point(s).

HERE'S WHY:

A quadratic equation can be thought of as a function ("f(x)=" is a fancy way of saying "Y=") ; the point being you have an equation where Y = ax^2 + bx + c ***THE KEY IS THE "Y =" PART!!!

When you're asked how many "solutions" this type of equation has, it's really asking: how many times does the graph (the Parabola in this case) intersect the X-axis?

You "solve" a quadratic equation by figuring out "WHEN Y=0 what does X equal?" That's why you set the equation to 0 and not any other number; to find the X-intercept(s) aka (x, 0) point(s).

The ROOTS of a quadratic equation exactly means the x-intercepts ((x,0) values)

*NOTE: No solutions means the parabola does not intercept the x-axis (maybe the parabola is above the x-axis or completely below it)

2 solutions (which is the most common for parabolas) means there are TWO places the parabola crosses the x-axis.

Finding the solutions means finding the (x,0)point value(s)

Hope this conceptual understanding helps you as much as it did me! :)

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.