2
$\begingroup$

Let $v_1 \begin{bmatrix}0\\-2\\2\end{bmatrix}, v_2 = \begin{bmatrix}1\\2\\0\end{bmatrix}$ and $v_3 = \begin{bmatrix}2\\0\\-1\end{bmatrix}$ be eigenvectors of the matrix $A$ which correspond to the eigenvalues $\lambda_1 = -1, \lambda_2 = 1$ and $\lambda_3 = 4$ respectively and let $v = \begin{bmatrix}0\\0\\5\end{bmatrix}$ Express $v$ as a linear combination of $v_1,v_2,$ and $v_3$, and find $Av$

$$v =\ \ ...v_1 +\ \ ...v_2+\ \ ...v_3$$

$Av = $ (Should be a $3\times 1$ Matrix)

I know $A(v_1 + v_2 + v_3) = Av_1 + Av_2 + Av_3 = \lambda_1 v_1 + \lambda_2 v_2 + \lambda_3 v_3$ though I'm not sure how to get the linear combination? Are they wanting me to put this matrix in RREF form and solve a system of equations? Or should I let $v = \lambda_1 v_1 + \lambda_2 v_2 + \lambda_3 v_3$? I'm sort of lost

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ To begin with forget about the fact that $v_1, v_2, v_3$ are eigenvectors. You should know by now how to find numbers $x,y,z$ such that $$xv_1 + yv_2 + zv_3 = v$$ Hint: can you represent this equation in the form $Ax=b$? $\endgroup$ – user137731 Jul 19 '16 at 3:04
  • $\begingroup$ I did $\begin{bmatrix} 0&1&2\\-2&2&0\\2&0&-1\end{bmatrix}$ and got the REF of $\begin{bmatrix}2&0&-1\\0&2&-1\\0&0&-5\end{bmatrix}$ so then I got $2x - z =0$, $2y-z = 0$ and $-5z = 5 \implies z = -1$ so then I get $y = -1/2$ which is different than what Majid is doing $\endgroup$ – Yusha Jul 19 '16 at 3:39
1
$\begingroup$

Assuming $av_1+bv_2+cv_3=v$, we have $$\begin{cases} b+2c=0\\ -2a+2b=0\\ 2a-c=5 \end{cases}$$ and by solving the sysytem, you have got $a=2$, $b=2$, and $c=-1$.

To find $Av$, as you mentioned, we have $$Av=A(2v_1+2v_2-v_3)=-2v_1+2v_2-4v_3= \begin{bmatrix}-6\\8\\0\end{bmatrix}$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I did $\begin{bmatrix} 0&1&2\\-2&2&0\\2&0&-1\end{bmatrix}$ and got the REF of $\begin{bmatrix}2&0&-1\\0&2&-1\\0&0&-5\end{bmatrix}$ so then I got $2x - z =0$, $2y-z = 0$ and $-5z = 5 \implies z = -1$ so then I get $y = -1/2$ why is mine different $\endgroup$ – Yusha Jul 19 '16 at 3:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Actually, in your way, you updated the matrix without updating the vector $v$. In fact, you should put the vector $v$ by side of the matrix and do the same to this vector as you do to the matrix, and at the end, you have a system according to updated version of vector $v$. $\endgroup$ – Majid Jul 19 '16 at 3:47
  • $\begingroup$ That makse sense! $\endgroup$ – Yusha Jul 19 '16 at 3:48
1
$\begingroup$

Hint: Try this. Assume arbitrary scalars $\alpha,\beta,\gamma$ and take $$v=\alpha v_1+\beta v_2+\gamma v_3.$$ Now solve for $\alpha,\beta,\gamma$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.