If $v_1 = \begin{bmatrix}5\\3\end{bmatrix}$ and $v_2 = \begin{bmatrix}3\\1\end{bmatrix}$ are eigenvectors of a matrix $A$ corresponding to the eigenvalues $\lambda_1 = -1$ and $\lambda_2 = 4$ respectively, then

$A(v_1 + v_2)= ?$

What about $A(3v_1) = ?$

I get what I'm doing wrong. I did $v_1 + v_2 = \begin{bmatrix}5\\3\end{bmatrix} + \begin{bmatrix}3\\1\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}8\\4\end{bmatrix}$ then I did $A(\begin{bmatrix}8\\4\end{bmatrix})= \begin{bmatrix}-1&0\\0&4\end{bmatrix}*\begin{bmatrix}8\\4\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}-8\\16\end{bmatrix}$

  • $\begingroup$ Hint. Do not add up the vectors first. You must first examine the multiplication $Av=\lambda{v}$ on both $v1$ and $v2$. And your eigenvalues are given.... $\endgroup$ – imranfat Jul 19 '16 at 2:30

$A$ is only diagonal with respect to a basis of eigenvectors, namely $v_1$ and $v_2$, not the standard basis, which is why your computation fails. Try using linearity and the definition of eigenvectors instead:

$A(v_1+v_2)=Av_1+Av_2=\lambda_1 v_1+\lambda_2 v_2$

Similarly for $A(3v_1)$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ I did that and got the same answer. $\endgroup$ – Yusha Jul 19 '16 at 2:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You must have made an error. Did you compute $-v_1+4v_2$? $\endgroup$ – solstafir Jul 19 '16 at 2:39
  • $\begingroup$ You're correct. I failed to see the property you were showing. I see it now and got (7,1) for the first one and (-15,-9) for the second. Thanks $\endgroup$ – Yusha Jul 19 '16 at 2:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.