• $d\in\mathbb N$
  • $\Omega\subseteq\mathbb R^d$ be open
  • $\mathcal D(\Omega):=C_c^\infty(\Omega)$
  • $f\in L^2(\Omega)$ and $$\langle f\rangle:=\left.\langle\;\cdot\;,f\rangle_{L^2(\Omega)}\right|_{\mathcal D(\Omega)}\in\mathcal D'(\Omega)$$
  • $i\in\left\{1,\ldots,d\right\}$

Since $\mathcal D(\Omega)$ is dense in the Sobolev space $H_0^1(\Omega)$, it's easy to see that the distributional derivative $$\frac{\partial\langle f\rangle}{\partial x_i}(\phi)=-\langle\frac{\partial\phi}{\partial x_i},f\rangle_{L^2(\Omega)}\;\;\;\text{for all }\phi\in\mathcal D(\Omega)\tag 1$$ has a unique extension $\overline{\frac{\partial\langle f\rangle}{\partial x_i}}\in H_0^1(\Omega)'$ to $H$ with $$\overline{\frac{\partial\langle f\rangle}{\partial x_i}}(u)=-\langle\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_i},f\rangle_{L^2(\Omega)}\;\;\;\text{for all }u\in H_0^1(\Omega)\;,\tag 2$$ where $\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_i}$ denotes the weak derivative. The mapping $$\overline{\frac\partial{\partial x_i}}:L^2(\Omega)\to H_0^1(\Omega)'\tag 3$$ is linear and continuous.

Now, I've read that we can define $$\Delta:=\sum_{j=1}^d\overline{\frac\partial{\partial x_i}}\:\overline{\frac\partial{\partial x_i}}\tag 4$$ as a continuous operator $H_0^1(\Omega)\to H_0^1(\Omega)'$. Why is the composition of the operators in $(4)$ well-defined? That's not clear to me, cause each operator is $H_0^1(\Omega)'$-valued and takes values from $L^2(\Omega)$.

I've noticed that $$\overline{\frac{\partial\langle f\rangle}{\partial x_i}}=\left.\langle\;\cdot\;,\frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i}\rangle_{L^2(\Omega)}\right|_{L^2(\Omega)}\;,$$ if $f\in H_0^1(\Omega)$. So, maybe $\overline{\frac{\partial\langle f\rangle}{\partial x_i}}$ is identified with the weak derivative $\frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i}$ (which is an element of $L^2(\Omega)$ in that case.

  • $\begingroup$ you are over-complicating things. Start with $\Omega = [0,1]$ and integrate by parts $\int_0^1 f'(x) g'(x) dx$, see the 4 lines answer below. $\endgroup$ – reuns Jul 10 '16 at 19:06

One can define $\Delta$ in $H^1$ because $\Delta$ is in divergence form

$$\Delta u = \text{div}\nabla u$$

Thus we define $\Delta : H^1_0(\Omega) \to H^1_0(\Omega)^*$ by

$$\Delta f (\phi) := -\int_\Omega \nabla f \cdot \nabla \phi.$$

The right hand side is well defined for $f , \phi \in H^1_0(\Omega)$. If $f$ is in $H^2_0$, then integration by part gives

$$\Delta f(\phi) = \int_\Omega (\Delta f) \phi$$

  • $\begingroup$ why $H^2_0$ ? $\int_\Omega \nabla f . \nabla \phi$ is well-defined whenever $f \in H^1, g \in H^1$, and if $f,g\in H^1_0$ it is equal to $\int_\Omega \phi \Delta f$, no ? $\endgroup$ – reuns Jul 10 '16 at 19:08
  • $\begingroup$ To make sense of $\Delta f$ in $\int_\Omega \phi \Delta f$, , you need some sort of twice differentiability @user1952009 $\endgroup$ – user99914 Jul 10 '16 at 19:10
  • $\begingroup$ not if by definition $\int_\Omega \phi \Delta f = -\int_\Omega \nabla \phi . \nabla f $ ? (the distributional derivative), but for showing it makes sense we need to show it is valid on a dense subset of $H^1_0$ (for example $C^\infty_c$) or something like that $\endgroup$ – reuns Jul 10 '16 at 19:11
  • $\begingroup$ As distribution for all $f\in L^2$ you can define $\Delta f$ as a distribution $\Delta f(\phi) = \int f \Delta \phi$. But this $\Delta f$ is not in $H^1_0(\Omega)^*$ @user1952009 $\endgroup$ – user99914 Jul 10 '16 at 19:14
  • $\begingroup$ that's my question, that it is in $(H^1_0(\Omega))^*$ depends on if $\int_\Omega \phi \Delta f = -\int_\Omega \nabla \phi . \nabla f $ $\endgroup$ – reuns Jul 10 '16 at 19:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.