Let $\mathbb{H}$ be a Hilbert space, $A$ a self-adjoint operator with domain $D_{A}$, $R_{A}$ the resolvent of $A$, and $z$ a point in the resolvent set $\rho(A)$. How could you prove the inequality \begin{equation} ||R_{A}(z)|| \leq 1/ d(z,\sigma(A)), \end{equation} where $\sigma(A)$ is the spectrum of $A$, and $d(z,\sigma(A))$ the distance of $z$ from $\sigma(A)$? I found this inequality in Hoslip & Sigal, Introduction to Spectral Theory, Sect 5.2, where they reference Reed and Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, vol. I, but I could not find a proof in that book. Thank you very much in advance.

PS I just note here that since for any closed operator \begin{equation} ||R_{A}(z)|| \geq 1/ d(z,\sigma(A)), \end{equation} (just note that all the point $w$ such that $|z-w| < ||R_{A}(z)||$ belong to $\rho(A)$), the above inequality must actually hold with equality.


For a bounded normal operator $N$, the norm and spectral radius of $N$ are the same. That is, $\|N\|=\sup_{\lambda\in\sigma(N)}|\lambda|$.

Let $\lambda \notin \sigma(A)$. Assume $A$ is unbounded. Then $(A-\lambda I)^{-1}$ is bounded and normal, with $$ \sigma((A-\lambda I)^{-1})=\frac{1}{\sigma(A)-\lambda}\cup\{0\}=\left\{ \frac{1}{\mu-\lambda} : \mu\in\sigma(A) \right\}\cup\{0\}. $$ Therefore, $$ \|(A-\lambda I)^{-1}\|=\sup_{\xi\in\sigma((A-\lambda I)^{-1})}|\xi| = \sup_{\mu\in\sigma(A)}\frac{1}{|\mu-\lambda|} = \frac{1}{\mbox{dist}(\lambda,\sigma(A))}. $$

  • $\begingroup$ It looks much more simple than I could ever imagine! I have only a doubt about the first line. I only know that $\mu \in \mathbb{C}$ belongs to $\sigma(A)$ if and only if $(\mu - \lambda)^{-1}$ belongs to $\sigma(R_{A}(\lambda))$. But still $\sigma(R_{A}(\lambda))$ could contain zero. Or am I wrong? This in any case shouldn't change the proof. Thank you very much for your invaluable help. $\endgroup$ – Maurizio Barbato Jul 10 '16 at 21:43
  • $\begingroup$ The result I quoted in my previous comment is from Schmudgen, Unbounded Self-Adjoint Operators on Hilbert Space, Proposition (2.10). $\endgroup$ – Maurizio Barbato Jul 10 '16 at 22:20
  • $\begingroup$ @MauryBarbato : If $A$ is unbounded, then $0$ is in the spectrum of $(A-\lambda I)^{-1}$, which is the only possible point being left out of $\frac{1}{\sigma(A)-\lambda}$, but $0$ is in the closure of the set $\frac{1}{\sigma(A)-\lambda}$ if $A$ is unbounded. I invoked closure to avoid a lengthy discussion of that one point $0$. $\endgroup$ – DisintegratingByParts Jul 10 '16 at 22:28
  • $\begingroup$ @MauryBarbato : Actually I think you have equality of the closure and the spectrum, which also gives equality for the norm in the final line. So that point was worth you mentioning it. I changed everything to equality (both of spectrum and of norm.) $\endgroup$ – DisintegratingByParts Jul 10 '16 at 22:34
  • $\begingroup$ If $A$ is bounded, then $0$ is not in $\sigma(R_{A}(\lambda))$, and since $\sigma(R_{A}(\lambda))$ is closed, there is a neighborhood $V$ of $0$ such that $\sigma(R_{A}(\lambda)) \cap V = \emptyset$. Consider now $A$ undbounded. Then $0$ is in $\sigma(R_{A}(\lambda))$. So to conclude that $\sigma(R_{A}(\lambda)) = \text{closure} \left( \frac{1}{\sigma(A) - \lambda} \right)$, it is enough to show that if $A$ is unbounded, then $0$ is not an isolated point of $\sigma(R_{A}(\lambda))$, as you claim. Could you give a proof or a reference for this statement? Thank you very much. $\endgroup$ – Maurizio Barbato Jul 11 '16 at 12:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.