Subjected to the following boundary conditions:

$\left.\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial x}\right|_{x=0,t}=c_1\theta\bigg\vert_{x=0,t}$

$-\left.\frac{\partial \theta}{\partial x}\right|_{x=1,t}=c_2\theta\bigg\vert_{x=1,t}$


Where $c_1$ and $c_2$ are nonzero constants.

I know I can solve it with fourier sin and cos expansion, but can I have analytical solution?

I accept "as far I know, it doesn't" or just tell me the method I should study.

(Physical meaning: It is a dimensionless transient heat conduction for 1D with uniform source and both boundary conditions with convection)


$\theta(x,t)=t$ is an analytic solution.

EDIT: With the introduction of the boundary conditions, I would say: No, I don't know any other method not involving Fourier transforms or separation of variables.

  • $\begingroup$ I'm sorry, now it has boundary conditions. $\endgroup$ Jul 6 '16 at 23:43
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Can you give some additional informations to the boundary conditions? At least, I cannot understand the right hand side, since it involves some $\theta$ which is also the name of your solution...? And what are $c_{1}$ and $c_{2}$? Constants? functions? $\endgroup$
    – Alex
    Jul 6 '16 at 23:46
  • $\begingroup$ @Alex , question updated! $\endgroup$ Jul 7 '16 at 0:21
  • $\begingroup$ As it seems to me, a stationary solution should do the trick: Try $\theta(t,x)=-\frac{x^{2}}{2}+bx+c$ with some constants $b$ and $c$ yet to be determined. If you plug in the boundary condition, you get at least one solution... $\endgroup$
    – Alex
    Jul 7 '16 at 0:47
  • $\begingroup$ @Vitor: Now, you have again changed the problem. What is wrong with proposing the full problem right from the beginning? $\endgroup$
    – Alex
    Jul 7 '16 at 17:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.