This is a follow up to:

Normal domains and powers of height one primes

In the comments to the linked question, user26857 noted that the prime ideal $P = (x,z)$ in the Noetherian normal domain $k[x,y,z]/(z^2-xy)$ is such that even though $z^2=xy\in P^2 = (x^2,xz,z^2)$, $P^2$ doesn't contain $x$ or any power $y^n$, and hence $P^2$ isn't primary.

However, if we consider $k[x,y,z]/(z^2-xy)$ as a scheme over $k[y]$, then it is a flat family of affine genus 0 curves which is smooth except above $y = 0$, where the fiber is $k[x,z]/(z^2)$. From this perspective, the prime $P = (x,z)$ corresponds to a section of this family of curves.

Now, if one restricts this family to the locus $y \ne 0$, then we get a smooth family, and it's easy to see that argument which shows that $P^2$ is not primary fails when we work in the ring $k[x,y,z,y^{-1}]/(z^2-xy)$.

My question is then:

  1. Is every power of the prime $(x,z)$ in $k[x,y,z,y^{-1}]/(z^2-xy)$ primary?

  2. Let $A$ be a Noetherian normal domain, and $B$ a smooth $A$-algebra with dimension 1 fibers, and $P\subset B$ a locally principal prime ideal such that $B/P$ is finite etale over $A$. Then must powers of $P$ be primary?

Basically, my intuition is that the failure of $P^n$ to be primary stems from either the failure of $P$ to be locally principal and/or the failure of the fiber $y = 0$ to be smooth.

  • $\begingroup$ Someone correct me: What about the localization at $\mathfrak{p}$? $\mathfrak{p}^n \subseteq A_{\mathfrak{p}}$ is a power of a maximal ideal, and hence is primary. Finally, primary ideals correspond through localization... $\endgroup$
    – basket
    Jul 4 '16 at 5:52
  • $\begingroup$ @basket The problem is that the contraction of $p^nA_p$ might not be $p^n$ (it might be strictly larger than $p^n$) $\endgroup$
    – oxeimon
    Jul 4 '16 at 5:57
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. very simple that one. $\endgroup$
    – basket
    Jul 4 '16 at 5:58
  1. The ring in question is just $k[z,y,y^{-1}]$. Any prime ideal in this ring is either zero, principal or maximal. All these have the property that that powers are primary.

  2. For any integral domain and any non-zero prime which is locally principal, the powers are primary. This can be checked locally and principal ideals have this property.

  • $\begingroup$ I only know that powers of principal primes are primary in a UFD - how do you see that this is also true in a general integral domain? Also how can you see that primary-ness can be checked locally? $\endgroup$
    – oxeimon
    Jul 4 '16 at 17:04
  • $\begingroup$ If $P$ is a prime ideal, the $P$-primary component of $P^n$ is denoted by $P^{(n)}$, the symbolic power and $P^n\subset P^{(n)}$. Checking equality is local and locally, if $P$ is a principal prime, it is trivial. UFD does not play any role for principal prime ideals. $\endgroup$
    – Mohan
    Jul 4 '16 at 17:33
  • $\begingroup$ I really don't see why if $P$ is a principal prime, then $P^n = P^{(n)}$. If it's so trivial perhaps you could edit it into your answer? $\endgroup$
    – oxeimon
    Jul 4 '16 at 17:59
  • $\begingroup$ Assume $P=(f)$. If $xy\in P^n$, then $f^n$ divides $xy$ and then $f$ divides $x$ or $y$, $f$ being a prime. I hope the rest is clear. $\endgroup$
    – Mohan
    Jul 4 '16 at 18:13
  • $\begingroup$ ah okay I guess that is pretty trivial... Thanks! $\endgroup$
    – oxeimon
    Jul 4 '16 at 19:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.