11
$\begingroup$

For a number field $K$, we define the ring of integers of $K$ to be $$\mathcal{O}_K:=\{x\in K\big|\ (\exists f\in\mathbb{Z}[X])(f\ \text{ is monic and } f(x)=0)\}.$$ Is there any easy way to see from this definition that $\mathcal{O}_K$ is finitely generated? I'm able to show that this is true, but I'm looking for something like a one-line proof or at least a clever remark clarifying this fact.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ I don't think a one-line proof exists. But the classical proof, albeit not trivial, is not that hard. Cf. for example Milne's lecture notes at jmilne.org/math/CourseNotes/ANT.pdf page 36. $\endgroup$
    – PseudoNeo
    Commented Aug 20, 2012 at 23:02
  • $\begingroup$ for future visitors: a related MSE thread, mentioning the same Milne Prop. 2.29 as the above comment, may be of interest: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3696487/… $\endgroup$
    – D.R.
    Commented Jan 28, 2023 at 5:30

1 Answer 1

16
$\begingroup$

The shortest proof I know is the following, and it doesn't generalize to a more abstract setting: let $\sigma_1, ... \sigma_n$ denote the $n$ embeddings $K \to \mathbb{C}$. Consider the map $(\sigma_1, ..., \sigma_n) : K \to \mathbb{C}^n$. Then this map embeds $\mathcal{O}_K$ as a discrete subgroup of $\mathbb{C}^n$, which is necessarily a finitely-generated free abelian group.*

The important step here is to check that the image of $\mathcal{O}_K$ is actually discrete, but this follows e.g. from the fact that if the $\sigma_i$ are too small then the elementary symmetric polynomials in the $\sigma_i$ (the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial) cannot take integer values (other than $0$).

*Sketch: given a discrete subgroup $G$ of $\mathbb{R}^d$, let $g_1, ..., g_r$ be a subset of $G$ which is a basis of $\text{span}(G)$ as a vector space. Then $\mathbb{Z} g_1 \oplus ... \oplus \mathbb{Z} g_r$ has finite index in $G$ because there are finitely many elements of $G$ in the parallelogram determined by the $g_i$ by discreteness.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Nice. BTW, whatever proof you give has to use something special about number rings. See e.g. the wiki en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nagata_ring $\endgroup$
    – Stephen
    Commented Aug 21, 2012 at 1:32
  • $\begingroup$ @Steve: thanks for the info. I had in mind the Dedekind case but wasn't aware of the restriction on the field of fractions. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 21, 2012 at 1:58

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .