0
$\begingroup$

Then give information about the equivalence classes as specified for

The relation $R$ on $ℝ$ given by $xRy$ iff $x-y∈ℚ$. Give the equivalence class of $0$; of $1$ ; $\sqrt{2}$.

First In order to solve this problem one must list what he/she knows in order to solve this problem.

Reflexive : R is reflexive on $A$ iff for all $x∈ A$, $xRx.$

Symmetric : R is symmetric iff for all $x$ and $y∈ A$ if $xRy,$ then $yRx.$

Transitive: R is transitive on A if for all $x$,$y$ $z ∈A$ if $xRy$, and $yRz$ then $xRz$.

An equivalence relation is defined if something is reflexive,symmetric, and transitive on A.

My question is how does one determine how this is a Reflexive relationship ?Does one have to substitute real numbers or rational numbers into the equation in order to find the relation. Does this also apply to Symmetric and transitive?

I also know how to determine an equivalence class, $\frac{x}{R} =$ {$ y∈A: xRy$}. I am just perplexed on how one proceeds.

This is what I have deduced so far.

$[0]$ = { $x ∈ ℝ$ : $0$Rx}

Any advice on how to proceed and solve

this, would be appreciated.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

The relation is reflexive since for all $x \in \Bbb R$, we have $x-x = 0 \in \Bbb Q$. To write the classes, use the definition of the relation. For the other properties, you have to check that if $x,y,z \in \Bbb R$ are such that $x-y,y-z\in \Bbb Q$, then $x-z \in \Bbb Q$, and finally that if $x-y \in \Bbb Q$, then $y-x \in \Bbb Q$.

About the classes, for instance, we have $$[0] = \{x \in \Bbb R \mid xR0\} = \{x \in \Bbb R \mid x - 0 \in \Bbb Q\} = \Bbb Q.$$In general, the classes will be "copies" of $\Bbb Q$ shifted by the representant, as in $$[\sqrt{2}] = \sqrt{2}+\Bbb Q = \{ \sqrt{2}+q \mid q \in \Bbb Q \},$$ etc.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ So for this problem does one not need to show a scenario where it is transitive and symmetric? So since x is real numbers y is rational numbers is that why it is symmetric? $\endgroup$ – Jon Jul 1 '16 at 20:32
  • $\begingroup$ Why shouldn't you have to prove the other properties? Of course you have to. I said it in the answer, to prove symmetry you take $x,y \in \Bbb R$. Then assume that $x-y \in \Bbb Q$. And check that $y-x \in \Bbb Q$. $\endgroup$ – Ivo Terek Jul 1 '16 at 20:34
  • $\begingroup$ You misunderstand, I just wanted to know that what you said above is enough to justify whether it be symmetric and transitive now I know more work is required. Sorry for the discrepancies. $\endgroup$ – Jon Jul 1 '16 at 20:37
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, it is the definition of these properties. What does $xRy$ mean? Look at the definition of the relation we're given. $\endgroup$ – Ivo Terek Jul 1 '16 at 20:37
  • $\begingroup$ X is a relationship to y. $\endgroup$ – Jon Jul 1 '16 at 20:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.