2
$\begingroup$

I'm reading Hoffman and Kunze's Linear Algebra book and on page 177 they stated and proved the following theorem:

It's a big proof which I didn't understand only a very little part of it:

I tried a lot but I couldn't understand why $\sigma_2^{-1}\gamma\sigma_1^{-1}\in G(r+s,t)$.

I think this fact is not from advanced group theory and we need only a basic knowledge of abstract algebra to prove this. Therefore I'm almost sure I missed something silly or the authors made a mistake in this proof.

I need help.

Thanks

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

This is straight from definitions.

  • The $\sigma$s by definition leave the members of the index set $I_t=\{r+s+1,\ldots,r+s+t\}$ invariant and $\gamma$ by definition permute the members of $I_t$ among themselves. Therefore $\sigma_2\gamma\sigma_1^{-1}$ permute the members of $I_t$ among themselves.
  • Similarly, by definition, the $\sigma$s and $\gamma$ permute the members of the index set $I_{rs}=\{1,2,\ldots,r+s\}$ among themselves. Therefore $\sigma_2\gamma\sigma_1^{-1}$ also permute the members of $I_{rs}$ among themselves.
  • So, in summary, $\sigma_2\gamma\sigma_1^{-1}$ permute the members of $I_{rs}$ among themselves and it also permute the members of $I_t$ among themselves. Now that's exactly what a permutation in $G(r+s,t)$ means.
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Why is the $\gamma$ an identity on $I_{rs}$? thank you very much for your answer! $\endgroup$
    – user42912
    Commented Jul 4, 2016 at 7:47
  • $\begingroup$ @user42912 Sorry, that was wrong. $\gamma$ by definition is in $G(r,s,t)$. It isn't an identity on $I_{rs}$. Nonetheless it permutes the members of $I_{rs}$ among themselves. This is now fixed in the answer. $\endgroup$
    – user1551
    Commented Jul 4, 2016 at 7:52

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .