10
$\begingroup$

I was trying different algorithms out, and after a while, I found this fractal:

Fractal

The generation has similarities to Koch's curve, but instead of putting triangles on triangles, I put circles on top of circles.

The algorithm is the following:

I go trough the angles between 0 and 360 degrees, and for each angle, I calculate the x and y positions of the next point on the curve with

$P_{x}=\sum_{i=1}^{n} \cos (a \cdot4^{i})\cdot r / 4^{i}$

$P_{y}=\sum_{i=1}^{n} \sin (a \cdot4^{i})\cdot r / 4^{i}$

where a is the current angle, r is the radius if the original circle, n is the level of the fractal and P is the position of the next point.

I looked for hours on the internet, but I couldn't find a similar fractal to this. Does this have a name or is it documented?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I have seen this at times called the Riemann curve or the Riemann-Weierstrass curve (altho I currently don't have a convenient reference on hand); this is because of the component functions' resemblance to the "continuous but nowhere differentiable" examples of Riemann and Weierstrass. $\endgroup$ – J. M. is a poor mathematician Jun 21 '16 at 15:29
  • $\begingroup$ What does "all the angles" mean? Do you have a picture? I agree with JM that the functions you define look like Weierstrass type functions, when graphed, but it doesn't sound like you're talking about the graph of a function. $\endgroup$ – Mark McClure Jun 21 '16 at 16:27
  • $\begingroup$ @Mark, "go through the angles between 0 and 360 degrees" and "where a is the current angle" seems to indicate to me that the OP is trying to describe a parametric equation. $\endgroup$ – J. M. is a poor mathematician Jun 21 '16 at 16:37
  • $\begingroup$ @J.M. Yes, I'm describing a parametric equation. I use a polar coordinate system here, That is why I need an angle and a radius, then I convert it to cartesian coordinates using sine and cosine $\endgroup$ – Bálint Jun 21 '16 at 16:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Then, perhaps this or this is it? $\endgroup$ – Mark McClure Jun 21 '16 at 22:01
6
$\begingroup$

This is not an actual answer, but it's too long for a comment.

Here is a similar construction:

enter image description here

Here is a Matlab code to plot this family of fractals:

N = 10000; % Number of points
R = 1; % Radius of outer circle
K = 4; % Parameter K
i = 0; % Initial point
f = 1; % Final point
d = f-i;
k = abs(K);
Q = round(log(N*R*(k-1)/d)/log(k)); % Number of iterations
t = 2*pi*(i:d/N:f-d/N);
[a,N] = size(t);
x = zeros(1,N);
y = zeros(1,N);
for q=1:Q
    x = x - (R*(k-1)/k^q)*sin(t*K^q/k);
    y = y + (R*(k-1)/k^q)*cos(t*K^q/k);
end
plot(x,y)
axis equal

The fractal in the link above is for $K = -3$. In your case, you used $K = 4$:

enter image description here

I was particularly interested in the case $K = -2$ and created this animated gif:

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That pretty much answered my question, he, let me give you a green tickmark $\endgroup$ – Bálint Feb 8 '17 at 13:51
  • $\begingroup$ UPDATE: I found a blog where that kind of curve is called a "fractal spirograph", or "fractal roulette": benice-equation.blogspot.com/2012/01/fractal-spirograph.html $\endgroup$ – Wood Feb 1 '18 at 4:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.