(see edits below with attempts made in the meanwhile after posting the question)


I need to modify a sigmoid function for an AI application, but cannot figure out the correct math. Given a variable $x \in [0,1]$, a function $f(x)$ should satisfy the following requirements (pardon the math-noobiness of my expression):
a) the values of $f(x)$ should be costrained to $[0,1]$
b) when $x=0$ then $f(x)=0$, and when $x=1$ then $f(x)=1$
c) $f(x)$ should follow a sigmoid or "S-curve" shape within these bounds, with some variable changing the "steepness" of the curve.

I used a different function earlier, corresponding to (0), illustrated below on the left:

(0) $f(x) = x^{(z+0.5)^{-b}}$ , where $b=2$ with $z \in [0,1]$ controlling the curve

What is a function that would satisfy these requirements, i.e. do the same thing as equation (0) but with an S-curve$?_{(I\hspace{1mm} hope\hspace{1mm} this\hspace{1mm} makes\hspace{1mm} at\hspace{1mm} least\hspace{1mm} some \hspace{1mm}mathematical\hspace{1mm} sense...)}$

Attempt 1

I tried to accomplish something similar with a logistic function (by varying the $x_0$ value; cf. equation (1) and the right side plot above)

(1) $f(x) = \dfrac{1}{1 + e^{-b(x-(1-x_0))}}$ , where $b=10$, $x_0 \in [0,1]$

...so that $x_0 = 0.5$ yields some central or average curve (like the linear growth line on the leftmost plot), and values around it rise or lower the steepness. Shortcoming: the "ends" of the curve where $x=\{0,1\}$ won't reach the required values of 0 and 1 respectively. I don't want to force it arbitrarily with an if-else, it should come naturally from the properties of an equation (and as such form nice curves).

Attempt 2

This sort of does the trick, now the ends smootly reach 0 and 1 for all values of $x_0$:

(2) $f(x) = \Bigg(\bigg( \dfrac{1}{1 + e^{-b(x-(1-x_0))}}\bigg)x\Bigg)^{1-x} $

Only problem, the effect is not "symmetrical", when comparing high and low values. Observe the values for $f(x)$ with $x_0 = [0,1]$; $b=10$ (left side plot below). The curve steepness varies more among lower $x_0$ values (yellow,red) than amoing higher values (pink); also, changing $x_0$ also has noticably more effect in lower values of $x$ than its higher values.

enter image description here

Attempt 3

Ok maybe if-elsing the hell out of those extreme values is not such a bad idea.

(3) $f(x) = \Bigg(\bigg( \dfrac{1}{1 + e^{-b(x-(1-x_0))}}\bigg)g(x)\Bigg)^{1-h(x)} $

where $g(x) = \left\{\begin{array}{ll}1 & x>0\\0 & otherwise\end{array}\right.$ and $h(x) = \left\{\begin{array}{ll}1 & x==0\\0 & otherwise\end{array}\right.$

The right side plot above illustrates the result: the ends are still nicely 0 and 1, and now the curves above and below $x_0=0.5$ are symmetrical, but there are noticable "jumps" on $x=0.1$ and $x=0.9$ if $x_0$ is in its either extremes. Still not good.

So far all my attempts are all so-so, each lacking in some respect. A better solution would thus still be very welcome.


Look for this substitution (kx-x)/(2kx-k-1) x from 0 to 1 k from -1 to 1 Then you can scale the argument if you will need

https://dinodini.wordpress.com/2010/04/05/normalized-tunable-sigmoid-functions/ http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=(kx-x)%2F(2kx-k-1)+x+from+0+to+1+k+from+-1+to+1


I was just working on finding a similar function. In case anyone else lands here in the future, here is a sigmoidal function which satisfies:

$$f(0)=0$$ $$f(1)=1$$

and has a single parameter, $k$, controlling steepness:

$$f(x) = 1-\frac{1}{1+(\frac{1}{x}-1)^{-k}} $$

Note that, by symmetry, these will also always be true: $f(1/2)=1/2$, and $\int_0^1 f(x)dx = 1/2$.

Method: Since $\frac{1}{1+e^x}$ is a bijection from $\mathbb{R} \to [0,1]$; we can invert it to get a function mapping $[0,1] \to \mathbb{R}$, which is $h(x) = \ln(\frac{1}{x}-1)$. Then we can put $h$ into a standard (increasing) sigmoid which maps the reals back to $[0,1]$. The form of the sigmoid is:

$$ g(y) = 1-\frac{1}{1+e^{-ky}}$$

$f(x)$ is what you get when you simplify $g(h(x))$. Note that this $f$ is defined outside $x \in [0,1]$ and it does not asymptote out to 0 or 1, but it does achieve the desired behavior within that interval.

One additional note, in the special case where $k=1$, this function reduces to $f(x)=x$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.