1
$\begingroup$

Can fourier series notation be written in different ways but get the same result? I ask because I've seen these two diferent notations. What is the difference between the two? If they produce the same result I will just keep using the first one, as I am more comfertable with it. Thanks :)

enter image description here

and this notation:

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ They're largely just different notations for the same thing. But there is one key difference: In the first one, the domain of periodicity is $[-L,L]$ whereas in the latter it's $[0,T]$. So you shouldn't expect to get identical results. $\endgroup$ – Semiclassical Jun 16 '16 at 19:07
  • $\begingroup$ Frankly, I see no significant differences between the two. You should be able to abstract away from the naming/particular definition of the constants and similar details. Ad be ready to handle yet other notations. $\endgroup$ – Yves Daoust Jun 16 '16 at 19:07
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah, I thought they were very similar, except for the domains. The only things I wasn't really sure about were the a_0/2 coefficient at the start and the kwt and how that compares to (npix)/L $\endgroup$ – says Jun 16 '16 at 19:11
1
$\begingroup$

$$ k\omega t = \frac{2\pi kt} T \quad\text{if} \quad \omega = \frac{2\pi} T \quad \text{or} \quad T=\frac{2\pi} \omega. $$

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.